Revision u/s 264 - seeking direction to re-consider the claim of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 17, 2024

Revision u/s 264 - seeking direction to re-consider the claim of the petitioner for deduction u/s 80-IA - there is no limitation on the power of the Pr. CCIT, CCIT, CIT while invoking jurisdiction u/s 264 of the Act. It is not confined to legality or validity of an order passed by the assessing officer or a claim made and disallowed or a claim not put forth by the assessee. - Matter restored back for re-consideration of the revision application - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 264 - seeking direction to re-consider the claim of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 17, 2024

You may also like:

Section 264 revision application concerning long-term capital gain (LTCG) on extinguishment of shares due to loss arising from NCLT order. Petitioner's claim for loss on...

The Appellate Tribunal considered Transfer Pricing adjustment u/s 92 for inter-unit power transfer. TPO rejected TP report, comparing sale prices with GEB. Tribunal...

Revision u/s 264 - deduction u/s 80-IB - Provision of Section 80A(5) is a statutory interdict which would prevent the CIT from granting any such claim in exercise of his...

Profit of eligible unit by on account Baggase Purchase u/s 80-IA(8) r.w.s. 80-IA (10) - Assessee’s manufacturing unit has sold “bagaase” to assessee’s power unit at Rs....

Deduction u/s 80-IA - assessee has not set up any power plant but only operating and maintaining the power plant set up and is a contractor for the purpose of rendering...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - It is manifest that only suo-motu power of the Commissioner under Section 264 of the IT Act, is restricted against an order...

Revision of other orders u/s 264 - petitioners sought to expressly withdraw the revision petition filed u/s 264 - application was pending for decision - Thus by not...

Revision power u/s 264 - CIT committed a manifest error in exercising revisional power when petitioner's appeal was pending before CIT (Appeals) - HC

The High Court held that the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act falls within the ambit of 'any orders' envisaged u/s 264, making revision maintainable against...

Revision u/s 264 - Period of limitation - an order under Section 264 is required to be passed within a period of one year from the end of Financial Year, in which, the...

Deduction under Section 80-IA - preparing of designs and drawings - Activity of the assessee falls within the meaning of the word 'manufacture' or produce used in...

The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 and the consequent initiation of reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the assessee. The key points...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80-IA due to the assessee's failure to file Form no.10CCB on time. The Tribunal found that...

Revision u/s 264 - period of limitation - The petitioner had applied before the AO u/s 154 within four years of the order sought to be corrected. The petitioner did not...

The High Court held that the Commissioner of Income-Tax, while exercising revisionary powers u/s 264 of the Income Tax Act, is duty-bound to consider the revision...

Quick Updates: