Validity of demand of VAT and penalty - suppression of the ...

Court Upholds VAT Demand and Penalty for Sales Suppression and Stock Discrepancies Under HVAT and Central Sales Tax Acts.

January 22, 2024

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Validity of demand of VAT and penalty - suppression of the sales/stock difference - The penalty was confirmed based on a prior inspection u/s 29 of the HVAT Act and subsequent procedures under Section 38. The court upheld the tribunal's decision that the penalty was correctly levied under both the HVAT Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of demand of VAT and penalty - suppression of the ...

Court Upholds VAT Demand and Penalty for Sales Suppression and Stock Discrepancies Under HVAT and Central Sales Tax Acts.

January 22, 2024

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Assessee failed to justify receipt discrepancy between ITR and Form 26AS, AO made addition considering it as fees for technical services and imposed penalty u/s 270A for...

Service tax liability on sale of imported tally software was disputed. Appellant was a distributor marketing and installing the software on behalf of the seller holding...

The High Court considered the levy of VAT on a franchise of a trademark, analyzing whether the transfer of the right to use goods constituted a deemed sale. Citing a...

Addition on account of excess stock - discrepancies in stock records, unaccounted sales - we are satisfied with the documentary evidence that the alleged stock of cotton...

This case deals with the levy of deficit stamp duty and penalty in a court-conducted auction sale. The key points are: In a court-supervised auction sale, the stamp...

Addition for sale of sarki khalli - as alleged assessee has not having any such stock - Goods were received 10 days prior from 17.2.2010 by Poonam Road Lines. So the...

Shortage of goods - Discrepancy of stock as per form 3CD filed with income tax return - demand of duty upheld

The High Court considered a case u/s 129 of CGST Act regarding penalty imposition for a minor discrepancy in a Delivery Challan. The issue was whether non-disclosure of...

Evasion of tax - mismatch in the e-way bill and the branch transfer invoice - levy of penalty and tax on the petitioner - The High Court observed that, even if there was...

Unexplained deposits in bank account - Amount deposited in the bank account was out of sale of various items as held by the assessee as stock in trade and since the...

The High Court considered the legality of a penalty imposed u/s 31(3) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, due to the want of Form 28B. The issue was whether the defendants...

The High Court confirmed the tax assessment u/s 7A for nonproduction of sale bill. The burden of proof lies on the dealer to show transactions are not taxable. Failure...

The case involves disputes u/s CST Act and KVAT Rules. The High Court addressed issues including whether a time gap exceeding 100 days between transit end and buyer...

Penalty imposed on trader for importing goods with invalid import declaration form (Form XVI) instead of prescribed Form XVI u/s 48A of Uttarakhand VAT Act. Tribunal...

Penalty imposed by the Settlement Commission u/s 271(1)(c) - The petitioner argued against the penalty, citing lack of mens rea and the absence of evidence showing...

Quick Updates: