Levy of Penalty u/s 271 - certain expenses which were not ...

Court Rules In Favor of Taxpayer: Inadvertent Filing Error Not Grounds for Penalty u/s 271.

February 2, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Levy of Penalty u/s 271 - certain expenses which were not allowable expenses under the Act were not added back to the total income - The High Court concludes that, in this case, the tax audit report was filed along with the return of income, and the mistake in not properly uploading the return was a genuine error in the given circumstances. As a result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Penalty u/s 271 - certain expenses which were not ...

Court Rules In Favor of Taxpayer: Inadvertent Filing Error Not Grounds for Penalty u/s 271.

February 2, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee has furnished bonafide and genuine explanations as to an inadvertent mistake committed by it which was an human error committed...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

HC held that a registered assessee who committed a technical error in filing GST TRAN-1 cannot be denied transitional tax credit. The court emphasized that procedural...

Seeking amendment of shipping bills - inadvertent error in the Shipping bills - seeking to credit ROSCTL benefit amounts to the petitioner’s Customs E-Scrip Ledger - The...

CBIC clarifies procedure for departmental appeals regarding interest/penalty under Section 128A of CGST Act. Where taxpayers have fully paid tax demands under Section 73...

Rectification of errors in filing GST Returns - The case involved errors made by the petitioner in their GST returns for the period July 2017, initially by incorrectly...

The ITAT ruled that penalties under sections 271(1)(c) and 270A against the taxpayer were improper and directed their deletion. The tribunal held that merely making an...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - While apparently surrendering all the income on its own by the Assessee ought not to have attracted penalty for concealment under Section...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

HC ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) regarding book profit discrepancies. The court found that the assessee, a government entity, voluntarily disclosed income mismatches...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Quick Updates: