Detention of goods - penalty order - Part B of the E-Way Bill ...

Detention of Goods for Incomplete E-Way Bill Part B Deemed Unsustainable Without Intent to Evade Taxes.

February 8, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Detention of goods - penalty order - Part B of the E-Way Bill was not filled up - The High court observed that the department failed to prove any intention on the petitioner's part to evade tax and noted previous judgments directly relevant to the case. - Given the technical nature of the defect and the absence of intent to evade tax, the court found the penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of the Act unsustainable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Detention of goods - penalty order - Part B of the E-Way Bill ...

Detention of Goods for Incomplete E-Way Bill Part B Deemed Unsustainable Without Intent to Evade Taxes.

February 8, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Detention of goods due to incomplete Part B of E-way bill. No dispute on documents/goods. Part B filled before notice/seizure order. No mens rea found to evade tax....

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - Referencing the judgment in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.'s case, the Court observed that the...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

E-Way Bill was not properly filled, but upon inspection, no discrepancy was found between the physically available goods and the goods disclosed in the E-Way Bill. The...

HC set aside penalty orders under GST Act Section 129(1) and allowed refund application. The appellate authority's dismissal was deemed unjustified as there was no clear...

Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill...

Incomplete E-way bill - GST - Seizure of goods with vehicle - detention on the ground that Part-B of e-way bill was incomplete - Merely of none mentioning of the vehicle...

HC determined that detention of goods and penalties imposed for missing e-tax invoice were unjustified. While physical tax invoice, e-way bill, and bilty accompanied the...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Detention of goods on onward journey - detention on ground goods dispatched to different place than mentioned in documents - levy of penalty u/s 129 of UPGST Act -...

The Rajasthan High Court considered a case involving the detention of goods due to an expired e-way bill, raising concerns about tax evasion. Citing a judgment from the...

Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way...

Detention of goods alongwith the vehicle - breakdown of vehicle - non-extension of the validity of the e-way bill - intent to evade tax or not - the explanation offered...

Levy of penalty for violation of section 129 and Rule 138 - Failure to update the E-way bill on change of vehicle after breakdown - The imposition of penalties for mere...

Quick Updates: