Addition u/s 68 - The Tribunal, in dismissing the revenue's ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 14, 2024

Addition u/s 68 - The Tribunal, in dismissing the revenue's appeal, noted that while the AO had raised suspicions regarding the genuineness of the transaction, no tangible material was brought on record to support such suspicions. The assessee had disclosed the names of the jewellers to whom the jewellery was sold, along with evidence of payment through banking channels. - Now High Court confirmed the order of ITAT.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - The Tribunal, in dismissing the revenue's ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 14, 2024

You may also like:

The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions u/ss 69C and 68 for undisclosed credit card expenditures in foreign currencies based on material found during a survey. The...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

Bogus share transactions were alleged, and the Assessing Officer (AO) denied the assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(38) by treating the sale consideration of shares...

In this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding long-term capital gains (LTCG) from share...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus LTCG from sale of shares. The Tribunal noted that the transactions were conducted on a...

Jurisdictional issue regarding notice u/s 143(2) was addressed, with ITAT holding that the initial notice by ACIT, Circle-5(1), Delhi was within time, and subsequent...

The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding various additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal ruled that the RTGS transfer from the...

The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied...

Addition u/s 68 - the additional ground raised by the assessee that addition cannot be made u/s 68 of the Act on the basis of the bank statement is rejected.

Addition u/s 68 - investment made by the partners - AO has examined 79 unsecured creditors who appeared before the AO and given statements on oath. All of them have...

Addition u/s 68 - unsecured loans Addition u/s 2(22)(e) - Deemed dividend - The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's submissions, noting that all relevant documents...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit - capital contribution in cash by the partners - While deleting the additions, the Tribunal held that, if the Ld. AO was not...

Revision u/s 263 - Failure of AO levy tax u/s 115BE for the additions made u/s 68 - AO having made addition u/s 68 of the Act, taxing it at the rate prescribed u/s...

Quick Updates: