Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - ...

Tribunal Upholds Penalties for Fraudulent Imports Using Dummy Codes and Mis-Declared Values Under Customs Act.

February 16, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - fraudulent import in the name of dummy IECs with mis-declaration in description and value inputs - Abetment - The tribunal held that, the appellant’s own statement afford sufficient corroboration to those statements. Cross-examination is vital for meeting out the allegations But when there is sufficient corroboration to those allegations, denial of cross-examination cannot be held prejudicial - there are sufficient ingredients for commission of offence by the appellant. - Demand with penalties confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - ...

Tribunal Upholds Penalties for Fraudulent Imports Using Dummy Codes and Mis-Declared Values Under Customs Act.

February 16, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 (a) and (b) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Abetment in mis-declaration of goods and evasion of duty - The appellants were accused of being...

Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

Penalty imposed for import of chemicals using fake duty exemption licenses. Appellant claimed exemption under DEPB but used fake licenses and TRAs. Statement of witness...

Imports Of Marble slabs - Mis-declaration of quantity in the declared goods - Considering the appellant's failure to contest the discrepancy during assessment and their...

Mis-declaration of quantity - Assorted spectacle - The Tribunal acknowledged the misdeclaration of quantity, confirming that the actual quantity exceeded the declared...

CESTAT appellate tribunal determined copper rod import classification dispute. The tribunal upheld classification under CTH 74081190, rejecting CEPA exemption due to...

Levy of penalty - Abetment in Fraudulent export - The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal of CESTAT Bangalore addressed a case of fraudulent export and misdeclaration of...

Levy of penalty for abetting in mis-declaration of imported goods - Revocation of Courier License - The tribunal ruled that penalty under this section could only be...

Levy of penalty - Misclassification - nature of imported goods as Dried Garlic or not - Regarding the classification of the goods, the Tribunal upheld the appellant's...

In the case before CESTAT Bangalore, the issue revolved around mis-declaration of import value, duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalty imposition. The...

Customs broker licence revocation - importer engaged appellant to file import bill of entry but appellant used another broker's credentials instead of its own - imported...

Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

Valuation of imported goods - stamping foils - rejection of declared value - The tribunal found that the department's reliance on proforma invoices for A-grade goods was...

Levy of penalty of IEC code holder and middleman - Allowing third party to use its IEC code - Bonafide Belief - Misdeclaration of imported goods by third party - There...

CESTAT Bangalore upheld the imposition of penalty for misclassification of imported products under CTH 2938 instead of CTH 2106. The appellant mis-declared goods as 'Big...

Quick Updates: