Revision u/s 263 - successor PCIT / CIT did not agree with his ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 9, 2024

Revision u/s 263 - successor PCIT / CIT did not agree with his predecessor - second revision order - assessment has been set aside or de novo assessment - sending of the proposal by the successor-Assessing Officer - Share application money - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers - The appellant argued against the validity of the revision order, stating that the assessment order was passed after proper enquiries and verifications, and subsequent actions by the PCIT were unjustified. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, holding that the subsequent revision order was not sustainable under the circumstances.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - successor PCIT / CIT did not agree with his ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 9, 2024

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds...

Revision u/s 263 - Invocation of revision proceedings for the second time - As pertinent to point out that there was no bar on limitation by the ld. PCIT to invoke...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - Since the aforesaid exercise was carried out by the second AO in the reassessment...

Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 80I - what the learned tribunal ought to have noted is that whether the assessing officer/PCIT can revisit the claim which was accepted...

The Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 concerning the period of limitation. The issue was whether the period of limitation for...

Revision u/s 263 - the ld PCIT had invoked revision jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act on the very same point of allowability of LTCL. Hence it could be safely concluded...

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2(d) under section 263 specifically states that revision is possible only due to judgments of the jurisdictional High Court or supreme...

Revision u/s 263 - exemption u/s 11(2) - all the technical requirements were duly fulfilled by the assessee along with satisfactory response to the queries raised...

Revision u/s 263 - It is evident that A.O. made enquiries on the issue and assessee complied to the enquiries and filed all the required details. Thus, it is not a case...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - the assessee had duly explained as to why certain receipts though subjected to TDS, would not be liable to be offered to tax such as...

Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry is a reason for taking up the case for revision u/s 263 of the Act but the inadequate enquiry cannot be a reason for taking up the...

Appraisal report available but AO ignored, a fit case for revision u/s 263 - HC

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

Revision u/s 263 - Period of limitation - the limitation prescribed under section 263(2) would run from original assessment in respect of issue alien to reasons recorded....

Demerger/amalgamation of unit - Liability of predecessor / successor - Extended Period of limitation - The Revenue received the duty on the very same dispatches covered...

Quick Updates: