In the case before Punjab and Haryana High Court, undisclosed ...

Undisclosed Investment in Family Property Deemed Income; Court Upholds ITAT's Decision on Payment Disputes.

May 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

In the case before Punjab and Haryana High Court, undisclosed investment made to acquire rights in family property was deemed as undisclosed income for the block period. The revenue authorities found a receipt during search indicating the sister-in-law confirmed receiving the amount with no further payment due. The Income Tax Appellate Authority rejected the sister-in-law's certificate as biased towards the appellant. The court upheld the ITAT's decision that the property was handed over after full payment, supported by a demand draft receipt. The appellant's subsequent payments to the sister-in-law were not considered relevant as they were made after the search and without clear indication of settling the remaining amount. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the ITAT's order.

View Source

← Previous Next →

In the case before Punjab and Haryana High Court, undisclosed ...

Undisclosed Investment in Family Property Deemed Income; Court Upholds ITAT's Decision on Payment Disputes.

May 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271AAB - undisclosed investment - the assessee is a salaried person who is not required to maintain any books of accounts and there is no mechanism to report...

The ITAT Jodhpur ruled on additions made based on cash received for termination of a property purchase agreement and business expenses related to disputed agreements....

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - family transaction - assessee has submitted that the assessee’s husband was a power of attorney holder of the property and could not...

Unexplained loan u/s 68 - Since the assessee explained that sufficient loan amount have been taken from the family for purchase of property for family, then in that...

Benami transaction - availability of joint family property or income - joint family acquisition - Purchase of property in the name of wife (Mrs. A) - Presumption of...

Oppression and Mismanagement - disputes between three families - the Minutes of Discussion cannot be contemplated merely as a compromise of the NCLT proceedings and in...

Tribunal and CIT(A) concurred that Assessing Officer (AO) did not record any finding of undisclosed investment discovered during Excise Department's search, merely...

Undisclosed investment in FD - CIT (A) has rightly noted that the increase of her investment in FD with Bank of India was not her undisclosed income - AT

Deletion of undisclosed investment in fixed deposits – merely for the reason that there was a mistake in making entries, a disclosed investment cannot be treated as...

ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s addition under s.69 regarding unexplained property investment, accepting loan from assessee's mother as legitimate source after verification of...

The ITAT Chennai ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54, stating that investment in more than one property is not allowed. Assessee invested in two distinct properties in...

Undisclosed investment in furniture and fixture - surrender in survey subsequently retracted - onus of proof - If the assessee has denied making any such investment...

ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding disputed cash deposits and property investments made through NRE account. The tribunal rejected revenue authorities'...

Deduction u/s 54F is not available to an assessee who owns more than one house property at the time of purchasing a new property. The assessee, despite jointly...

Capital gains on partition among family members - determining market value of property - compromise decree resulted in assessee acquiring shares of others - no transfer...

Quick Updates: