The High Court considered a revision u/s 264 where the Principal ...

Pr. CIT dismissed a petition u/s 264 without procedural fairness. High Court directs rehearing.

May 25, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The High Court considered a revision u/s 264 where the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) dismissed the application without proper procedural fairness. The petitioner claimed no prior notice or opportunity to respond was given. The Court found the order lacked fairness as the petitioner's representation was not considered, and no reason was given for denying an adjournment. The order did not explain the basis for upholding the Assessing Officer's decision. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, and a rehearing was directed with the petitioner required to appear before the Pr. CIT on a specified date.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court considered a revision u/s 264 where the Principal ...

Pr. CIT dismissed a petition u/s 264 without procedural fairness. High Court directs rehearing.

May 25, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity Of Show cause notice - The case pertains to a dealer of woven fabrics and readymade garments challenging a tax demand order due to allegedly insufficient...

HC found procedural deficiencies in handling refund claims where foreign currency receipts lacked proper documentation through e-BRC filings. Despite timing...

The CESTAT upheld the remand order for reconsideration of refund claims of CVD paid by respondents. While refund of duty collected without authority of law is...

Valuation of imported goods - addition of franchise fee and international marketing charges incurred and of services obtained, in transaction value - The tribunal’s...

ITAT determined CPC's unilateral reduction of TDS credit was improper after previously granting full credit in three separate rectification orders. The subsequent...

The HC set aside the impugned Order-in-Original due to procedural irregularities that violated principles of natural justice. The order had incorrectly proceeded on the...

HC found no violation of natural justice principles in the appellate proceedings. The authority had fully complied with Section 107(9) by granting the petitioner...

HC addressed procedural challenge regarding SCN issuance under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962. While examining propriety of officer authority and adherence to natural...

HC set aside assessment orders due to procedural deficiencies in tax evaluation. Authority failed to consider complete financial details, particularly regarding tax...

HC invalidated the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to procedural deficiencies in the show cause notice (SCN). The original SCN failed to disclose the...

HC quashed tax demand order under GST Act due to procedural irregularities in notice service. Petitioner claimed no awareness of notices or orders, preventing timely...

Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner - service of SCN - The High court found discrepancies in the record regarding the petitioner's participation and noted...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 or u/s 153C - validity of proceedings - The High Court emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to properly apply relevant...

Assessment u/s 153C/153A - Computation of the Relevant Assessment Years Block - Jurisdiction for Reopening Assessments - The Delhi High Court meticulously analyzed the...

Validity of Adjusting Disputed Tax Demand Against Refunds Without Considering Stay Application - The High court found this action arbitrary and unfair, emphasizing that...

Quick Updates: