The High Court considered a revision u/s 264 where the Principal ...

Pr. CIT dismissed a petition u/s 264 without procedural fairness. High Court directs rehearing.

May 25, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The High Court considered a revision u/s 264 where the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) dismissed the application without proper procedural fairness. The petitioner claimed no prior notice or opportunity to respond was given. The Court found the order lacked fairness as the petitioner's representation was not considered, and no reason was given for denying an adjournment. The order did not explain the basis for upholding the Assessing Officer's decision. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, and a rehearing was directed with the petitioner required to appear before the Pr. CIT on a specified date.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court considered a revision u/s 264 where the Principal ...

Pr. CIT dismissed a petition u/s 264 without procedural fairness. High Court directs rehearing.

May 25, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity Of Show cause notice - The case pertains to a dealer of woven fabrics and readymade garments challenging a tax demand order due to allegedly insufficient...

HC found procedural deficiencies in handling refund claims where foreign currency receipts lacked proper documentation through e-BRC filings. Despite timing...

The CESTAT upheld the remand order for reconsideration of refund claims of CVD paid by respondents. While refund of duty collected without authority of law is...

ITAT determined CPC's unilateral reduction of TDS credit was improper after previously granting full credit in three separate rectification orders. The subsequent...

Valuation of imported goods - addition of franchise fee and international marketing charges incurred and of services obtained, in transaction value - The tribunal’s...

HC invalidated the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to procedural deficiencies in the show cause notice (SCN). The original SCN failed to disclose the...

HC quashed tax demand order under GST Act due to procedural irregularities in notice service. Petitioner claimed no awareness of notices or orders, preventing timely...

Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner - service of SCN - The High court found discrepancies in the record regarding the petitioner's participation and noted...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 or u/s 153C - validity of proceedings - The High Court emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to properly apply relevant...

Assessment u/s 153C/153A - Computation of the Relevant Assessment Years Block - Jurisdiction for Reopening Assessments - The Delhi High Court meticulously analyzed the...

ITAT dismissed taxpayer's appeal due to procedural deficiencies. Appeal involved 125-day delay without any condonation application being filed. Taxpayer failed to appear...

HC upheld validity of Section 132 of Companies Act 2013 and NFRA Rules while addressing disciplinary proceedings against audit firms and partners. Court rejected...

Confiscation of imported goods - Black pepper - advance authorisation scheme - diversion of Goods - fulfilment of export obligation or not - The Tribunal found that the...

Inordinate delay in adjudication of show cause notice by revenue authorities constitutes breach of fair procedure and violates principles of natural justice, causing...

Validity of assessment order - as argued without giving the petitioner an opportunity to reply by granting adjournment, the second respondent has now passed the...

Quick Updates: