The Delhi High Court reviewed a case involving a violation of ...

The order u/s 73 of CGST Act, 2017 lacked consideration of petitioner's detailed reply. AO directed to pass fresh order.

Case Laws GST

May 29, 2024

The Delhi High Court reviewed a case involving a violation of principles of natural justice in relation to an order issued under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court found the impugned order to be invalid as it failed to consider the detailed replies and supporting documents submitted by the Petitioner. The Proper Officer did not assess the reply on its merits and did not seek further clarification or documents from the Petitioner. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order dated 29.04.2024, ruling it as unsustainable. The petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Delhi High Court reviewed a case involving a violation of ...

The order u/s 73 of CGST Act, 2017 lacked consideration of petitioner's detailed reply. AO directed to pass fresh order.

Case Laws GST

May 29, 2024

You may also like:

The impugned order was passed without considering the reply filed by the petitioner and without affording an opportunity of personal hearing, despite a request being...

The High Court examined the validity of an assessment order issued without considering the reply submitted by the assessee in response to a Show Cause Notice. It was...

Assessment orders quashed due to petitioner's illness, remanded for fresh orders. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days. Cases remitted to...

The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

Validity of Orders passed u/s 73 - excess claim of Input Tax Credit [ITC] - Inadequate Consideration of Replies - The Court noted that the Proper Officer appeared to...

Time Limitation - validity of orders passed by the 1st respondent u/s 73(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - The High Court observed that, the...

Validity of notice issued u/s 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 challenged due to non-consideration of petitioner's reply, violating principles of natural...

Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

Revision u/s 263 - The Pr. CIT while passing the order u/s 263 cannot remand the matter back to the AO for passing the fresh order as it will lead to the conclusion that...

Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

Validity of Tax demand - Non consideration of reply submitted by the petitioner / assessee - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's contentions. It quashed the...

The High Court quashed the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax u/s 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, citing violation of...

Validity of an ex-parte revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: The PCIT passed...

Unreasoned orders passed u/s 73 of the Central/Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 violated principles of natural justice. The impugned orders were set aside, and...

Violation of principles of natural justice - Validity of demand of GST with interest u/s 73 - the Delhi High Court addressed the petitioner's challenge against the order...

Quick Updates: