The ITAT Surat held that the assessee failed to fulfill ...

LTCG deduction u/s 54F allowed despite pre/post-transfer payments. Provisions of sec 54/54F are benevolent.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 31, 2024

The ITAT Surat held that the assessee failed to fulfill conditions for LTCG deduction u/s 54F but allowed the deduction. The assessee used advance payments for construction of a new house. The ITAT cited M. George Jeoseph case to support the claim. Payments made to parties before and after filing return were justified. The ITAT referred to the ITO Vs. Rekha Shetty case to emphasize compliance with the main requirement of section 54. The CIT(A) approved deduction, noting genuine expenses for house construction. All payments to parties were supported by evidence. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Surat held that the assessee failed to fulfill ...

LTCG deduction u/s 54F allowed despite pre/post-transfer payments. Provisions of sec 54/54F are benevolent.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 31, 2024

You may also like:

Eligibility of deduction u/s 54 and 54F - in return deduction claimed u/s 54F - in assessment proceedings revised his claim u/s 54 - AO is duty bound to allow deduction...

The ITAT Chennai ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54, stating that investment in more than one property is not allowed. Assessee invested in two distinct properties in...

LTCG - Deduction u/s 54 - investment was made in the name of her spouse and not in the name of the Assessee - Section 54F/54 of the Act are the beneficial provisions...

LTCG - Exemption u/s 54 and 54F - Imposing the restriction on claiming high value deduction taken by high-net-worth assessees - Maximum deduction can be claimed upto 10...

Exemption u/s 54 / 54F - While section 54 of the Act deals with capital gains arising out of transfer of buildings or lands appurtenant thereto and being residential...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Deduction u/s 54 - The mere delay on the part of the developer to hand over the possession of the flat would not vitiate the claim of...

Deduction claimed u/s 54F OR 54 - Investment of LTCG - Owning more than one house property - CIT(A) deleted the addition considering the same u/s 54 - Assessee revised...

Deduction u/s. 54F - assessee has not become the owner of the property in question - becoming the owner of the property in question is not required for the purpose of...

Deduction u/s 54, 54F & 54EC - capital gains arising out of a single transaction of sale of immovable property - there is no such bar that both the deductions, u/s 54...

The appellant did not acquire a new residential property within the specified time period, failing the mandatory condition for deduction u/s 54. The CIT(A)-NFAC...

LTCG - deduction u/s 54 denied - Despite the assessee's claim of having constructed a residential property within the specified timeframe, a physical inspection revealed...

Deduction u/s 54 - LTCG invested in buying two residential units - the assessee would only entitle to the benefit of section 54, 1) if the assessee invested the LTCG...

The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3)...

LTCG - Denial of exemption u/s 54 - the ITAT observed that, for the purpose of claiming the benefit u/s 54 of the Act, within a period of one year before or two year...

LTCG - Deduction u/s. 54 - scope of amendment - "one" versus "a" - investment of capital gain into more than one residential units - Commissioner though referred the...

Quick Updates: