Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court addressed a challenge to an adjudication order ...


Challenging adjudication order u/s 78 of Finance Act, 1994 & Section 174 of CGST Act, 2017. Court emphasizes fair hearing & time limits.

Case Laws     GST

June 4, 2024

The High Court addressed a challenge to an adjudication order u/s 78 of Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 174 of CGST Act, 2017. The Court emphasized that while Section 33A of the Central Excise Act, 1994 limits adjournments to three dates, it does not deny the right to a hearing. The Act aims to expedite adjudication proceedings. The Court noted that fixing three successive dates within a week may suggest bias. The adjudicating authority must pass specific orders for each adjournment sought. The petitioner's right to a fair hearing was deemed impaired, so the Court disposed of the petition without requiring alternative remedies, as the petitioner's right to hearing was affected.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

  2. The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

  3. Violation of principles of natural justice - The court observed that while the show-cause notice provided details for a personal hearing, including the date, time, and...

  4. Validity of reopening of assessment - Re-opening notice u/s 148A(d) - personal hearing refused - the High court concluded that Section 148A(b) does not mandate a...

  5. Initiation of CIRP - Requirement of issuance of notice to the creditors before admission of the application - Since the statutory Scheme does not contain any obligation...

  6. Procedure for assessment - scope of e-Assessment Scheme - A link for personal hearing shall be sent to the petitioner and the petitioner shall be heard within a period...

  7. Challenge of jurisdiction u/s.120(4)(b) - If challenge to the jurisdiction has not been made within the prescribed time u/s.124(3) to the authority, whose jurisdiction...

  8. Bench Reconstitution and Order Pronouncement - Whether an order reserved by a bench could be pronounced by a reconstituted bench without considering a subsequent...

  9. Levy of Interest and penalty - extension of time to reply the queries raised - The circular of the respondent clearly stipulates that the communication granting time or...

  10. Violation of principles of natural justice - non-grant of opportunity of hearing - last hearing was virtual hearing granted only to main noticee with respect to only one...

  11. Waiver of pre-deposit - Application for early hearing - Can there be any ground for early hearing to be granted when the appellants/counsel for appellants, have them...

  12. Petitioner challenged validity of Assessment Order under Income Tax Act on grounds of breach of principles of natural justice and denial of opportunity for personal...

  13. Violation of the principles of natural justice - The petitioners asserted that since an adverse decision was made against them without a personal hearing, it was in...

  14. Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner...

  15. Assessment order u/s 147 read with Section 144B was challenged on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice as virtual hearing was not granted despite...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates