The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment due ...

Court ruled against reopening assessment after 4 years. Assessee's disclosure was enough.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 29, 2024

The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment due to disallowance of depreciation and reduced returned loss. The notice was issued after the 4-year period, leading to a challenge. The ITAT deemed the reopening as a change of opinion, thus invalid. The Court found that the assessing officer lacked tangible evidence for the reassessment and that the assessee had disclosed all necessary facts. Relying on the Kelvinator of India case, the Tribunal's decision was upheld in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment due ...

Court ruled against reopening assessment after 4 years. Assessee's disclosure was enough.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 29, 2024

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - assessment after 4 years - reason to suspect OR reason to believe - Reopening of assessment which is already concluded under Section...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopning after 4 years - As per the mandate of law, even where a concluded assessment is sought to be reopened by the A.O within a...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - while reopening no allegation was made by the learned AO of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all...

The assessment order was challenged on the grounds of validity of reopening after four years, based on a change of opinion and borrowed satisfaction. The assessee...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reopening after expiry of four years - Original assessment have been passed under section 143(3) on Dated 14.12.2011 and A.O. recorded...

Rectification of error - Period of limitation - The High Court observed that, there is no limitation prescribed for passing order under Section 22(4) of the TNVAT Act,...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only...

The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

Validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147, the requirement of fresh tangible material for reopening assessment, and the disallowance of expenditure incurred on DAP,...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - by the time, assessment order for the assessment year 2004-05 was passed on 31.12.2010, six year period for reopening of...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) could not reopen the assessment merely based on a belief that the average gross profit in the assessee's business...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Addition u/s 14A read with Rule 8D. "Reason to believe" in Section 147 means cause or justification for the competent authority to...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

The assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IC for the finished products manufactured at Unit No. III at Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, was initially allowed but later...

Quick Updates: