Reassessment notice u/s 148 was validly issued within the ...

Timely Reassessment Notice Issued; AO Follows Procedures for Bogus Purchase Disallowance Limited to 6.

July 5, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Reassessment notice u/s 148 was validly issued within the six-year time limit. The Assessing Officer (AO) recorded reasons for reopening on 19.03.2018, prior to obtaining sanction u/s 151 on 23.03.2018, and issued the notice on 27.03.2018, before the deadline of 31.03.2018. The AO followed the procedure mandated by the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Supreme Court's decision in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. case. The AO had valid reasons to believe based on information from the investigation wing about bogus entries provided by entry operators. Regarding estimation of income from bogus purchases, following the Pankaj K. Chaudhary case, the disallowance was restricted to 6% of the disputed bogus purchases, as the books of account were not rejected.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reassessment notice u/s 148 was validly issued within the ...

Timely Reassessment Notice Issued; AO Follows Procedures for Bogus Purchase Disallowance Limited to 6.

July 5, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment proceedings related to international tax charges must comply with the mandatory faceless procedure...

Validity of Reassessment notices issued unsigned - maintainability of writ petition against this issue in HC - The Court noted the petitioner's failure to file...

ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 against assessee. There was a difference between reasons communicated in notice u/s 148A(b) alleging bogus...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Bogus purchases - addition made towards entire bogus purchase - Assessee has literally wasted precious time of the AO by once again issuing notices and summons to the...

Reopening of an assessment beyond 4 years - issue of bogus purchases - specific and concrete information available with the AO - Reassessment proceedings sustained -...

Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the...

Bogus purchases - addition @ 12.5% of the bogus purchases - accommodation entries - no actual delivery of goods - notices issued u/s 133(6) were returned back unserved...

Additions towards Bogus purchases - Estimation of profit - Purchases are to be removed, the corresponding sale is also required to be removed from the profit and loss...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Validity of reopening an assessment and the legality of issuing a new Show Cause Notice u/s 148-A(b) after the conclusion of initial reassessment proceedings. The key...

The HC held that the jurisdictional assessing officer (JAO) who issued the original notices under the old regime can continue reassessment proceedings and pass...

The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

HC held that notices under s.148 issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer remain valid despite faceless assessment requirements, as traditional and faceless mechanisms...

Order passed by the AO u/s 143 (3) read with section 144C (1) titling it as “Draft Assessment Order” - AO while passing the impugned order, issued the demand notice u/s...

Quick Updates: