Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

AO failed to conduct proper inquiry regarding alleged bogus long ...


AO failed to inquire alleged bogus LTCG, not examining bankers, brokers, Demat agencies, source of funds, synchronized trades.

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 25, 2024

AO failed to conduct proper inquiry regarding alleged bogus long term capital gain by not examining bankers, brokers, Demat agencies involved in transactions, ascertaining source of funds, verifying synchronized trades, summoning person who deposited cheques in assessee's account. Connivance of bankers, brokers, Demat agencies suspected in such scams. AO directed to make larger inquiry, summon relevant parties, determine real income and rightful assessee. Matter remanded to AO for fresh adjudication after due inquiry, providing fair opportunity to assessee. Appeal allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Bogus LTCG - addition u/s 68 - exemption of LTCG u/s 10(38) - penny stock - neither the assessee nor his broker are named as illegitimate beneficiary to bogus LTCG in...

  2. The assessee provided documentary evidence supporting the purchase and subsequent sale of shares leading to long-term capital gains (LTCG). The evidence included...

  3. Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

  4. In this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding long-term capital gains (LTCG) from share...

  5. Assessee failed to declare Long Term Capital Loss (LTCL) on sale of shares of ECL and Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of shares of Saya in the return of income....

  6. The Assessee, a regular investor in shares, made investments and sold a particular script when prices were high, resulting in Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG). The...

  7. Appellate Tribunal examined disallowance of claim for futures and options (F&O) loss by Assessing Officer (AO) based on report alleging stock brokers manipulated...

  8. Naming / Tagging of demat accounts maintained by Stock Brokers - all demat accounts maintained by stock brokers should be appropriately tagged - Circular

  9. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  10. Revision u/s 263 - AO had issued u/s. 142(1) and has enquired about the details of sale of flat and LTCG etc. by asking question - AO had enquired about the issue of...

  11. Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s 10(38) denied - The AO contended that the LTCG was undisclosed income arising from alleged manipulation in penny stocks. However, the assessee...

  12. Bogus LTCG - Violation of principles of natural justice - before making addition in the hands of assessee proper opportunity of cross examining and opportunity to reply...

  13. Addition u/s 68 - cash credit - assessee being a share broker - All the equity shares so purchased first came in the Demat account of the assessee broker and then has...

  14. The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

  15. Unexplained credits u/s. 68 - Bogus LTCG - Penny stock purchases - Nothing on record to suggest that the shares were never with the assessee. On the contrary, the shares...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates