Rectification u/s 254 - Tribunal decided the appeal of the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 21, 2020

Rectification u/s 254 - Tribunal decided the appeal of the Revenue on merits and ex-parte - The proviso to Rule 25 deals with the situation where the Tribunal has passed an ex-parte order, due to non-appearance of the Respondent, even though the order was passed on merits. Thus, we are of the opinion that the reasoning given in para 6 of the Impugned Order is beyond the scope and ambit of Rules 25 of the ITAT Rules. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification u/s 254 - Tribunal decided the appeal of the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 21, 2020

You may also like:

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - ex-parte order on merit - assessee produced certain records after ex-parte order - factual aspect whether the assessee has received...

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and decide an appeal ex parte in the absence of the revisionist/appellant, as it would violate principles of...

Rejection of application u/s 254(2) by the ITAT to re-call the order - order was passed ex-parte - non appearance of assessee - No litigant would stand benefited by not...

Ex-parte order by CIT (Appeals) - Section 250(6) enjoins that the CIT(A) shall state the points for determination before it and the decision shall be rendered on such...

The Tribunal held that in a case involving a requisition u/s 132A of the Act, the jurisdiction to complete the assessment is governed by the provisions of Section 153A....

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - non consideration of decision refereed by the assessee in dealing with appeal - a mistake apparent from record - Tribunal recalled its order.

Ex-parte order - The order, ex parte in nature, passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, entails civil consequences; (c) It is also found that the...

Rectification of mistake u/s. 254(2) - Scope of tribunal in rectification - review of the order passed by the Tribunal in the guise of rectification which is not...

Rectification u/s mistake u/s 254 - apparent mistake in the order of Tribunal warranting rectification - scope of section 254(2) is limited to rectification of mistake...

Rectification u/s 254 - The High Court acknowledges that the Tribunal is the final authority to ascertain facts. However, it must rectify any apparent mistakes in its...

Validity of orders that were ex parte in nature - The order are ex facie, bad in law, because (a) violation of principles of natural justice, i.e. Fair opportunity of...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court - When the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the order passed by them,...

Rectification u/s 254 - Addition u/s 68 - non-consideration of certain facts in Order of the Tribunal - ignoring the material already on record on the part of the...

The ITAT Pune set aside an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service of hearing notice. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for non-prosecution without...

Rectification of order - Tribunal has tried to consider the issue on merits which was already considered by the Tribunal earlier while deciding the appeal – the...

Quick Updates: