Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different ...

Jurisdiction challenge rejected for non-participation. 10% deposit within 8 weeks for fresh hearing. File replies in 12 weeks. Final order in 2 months.

Case Laws GST

August 6, 2024

Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different officer from investigating officer. Petitioner negligent in non-participation in proceedings emanating from notices. Opportunity given subject to 10% disputed tax deposit within 8 weeks. Impugned quashed orders treated as addendum to notices. Petitioner to file separate replies within 12 weeks. Final orders on merits to be passed within 2 months thereafter. Petition disposed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different ...

Jurisdiction challenge rejected for non-participation. 10% deposit within 8 weeks for fresh hearing. File replies in 12 weeks. Final order in 2 months.

Case Laws GST

August 6, 2024

You may also like:

Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided...

Maintainability of appeal - appeal rejected as being defective for non-payment of the pre-deposit - the appeals filed by the instant petitioners u/s 107 of the CGST/BGST...

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

Appeal rejected on limitation grounds but petitioners' explanation ignored; appellate authority directed to note explanation per HC precedent, condone delay, hear appeal...

Challenge of jurisdiction u/s.120(4)(b) - If challenge to the jurisdiction has not been made within the prescribed time u/s.124(3) to the authority, whose jurisdiction...

CIRP process - security deposit and/or intercorporate deposit - Whether this ‘Security Deposit’ and the interest thereon would fall within the ambit of the definition of...

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

The appeal challenges the revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed for alleged violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(n)...

Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before...

The High Court considered a challenge to a search and seizure order under the UPGST Act. The court found non-compliance with the mandatory provision of Section 67 as the...

Customs Broker license revocation, security deposit forfeiture, and penalty imposition under Regulations 10(a), (d), (e), and (n) of CBLR challenged. Regulation 10(a)...

The appellate authority's order passed u/s 107 of the CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the appellate authority with a...

Exemption from Pre-deposit - The petitioner argued that their request for exemption from pre-deposit was wrongly rejected, and they challenged the jurisdiction of...

Jurisdiction to issue show cause notice (SCN) for levy of interest and penalty was challenged. Court held that writ petitions challenging impugned orders under Article...

Quick Updates: