Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the ...

Uncontested tax demand quashed, petitioner to remit 10% within 2 weeks to contest merits of GST liability.

Case Laws GST

August 24, 2024

Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner's reply enclosed only GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and income tax documents, failing to provide all relevant documents to establish that the services fall within the scope of Section 9(3) of the applicable GST enactments read with Notification No.13/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. Despite the petitioner's assertion that the services provided fall within the scope of the above provision and notification, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity by putting the petitioner on terms. The impugned order dated 18.12.2023 is set aside subject to the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petition is disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the ...

Uncontested tax demand quashed, petitioner to remit 10% within 2 weeks to contest merits of GST liability.

Case Laws GST

August 24, 2024

You may also like:

The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

The High Court set aside an assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits. The show cause notice and...

Validity of assessment order - reply to the ASTM-10 notice was not taken into consideration - violation of principles of natural justice - Acknowledging the importance...

The court set aside the impugned order pertaining to tax demand arising from mismatch between GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A, subject to petitioner remitting...

The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the petitioner not having a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The...

Show cause notice served on petitioner by uploading in GST portal tab without other communication mode; petitioner unaware of proceedings; tax demand confirmed due to...

The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner lacked access to the GST portal and was...

Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different officer from investigating officer. Petitioner negligent in non-participation in proceedings emanating...

Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to...

In a case concerning liability for Goods and Services Tax (GST) arising from civil contracts with government departments, the petitioner sought another opportunity to...

Petitioner did not have reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand due to mismatch between turnover in GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. Impugned order set aside on condition...

GST : 10 POINT SERIES ON SUPPLY - Goods and Services Tax - GST

Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity...

Quick Updates: