Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The assessee challenged the addition made u/s 69A for ...


Taxpayer's appeal allowed: Property purchase value & source proved; Addition under 69A deleted.

Case Laws     Income Tax

August 27, 2024

The assessee challenged the addition made u/s 69A for non-payment of advance tax, claiming the assessment proceedings were initiated based on wrong information. The Tribunal, being the final fact-finding authority, examined the material and found that the Assessing Officer erroneously initiated proceedings u/s 148, assuming the assessee had purchased an immovable property for Rs. 45 lakhs from Shri Madhava Gatti. However, the assessee produced the sale deed showing the purchase was from Mr. Madhava Gatti for Rs. 31 lakhs and provided the source of funds as a loan from Vijaya Bank. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the basis for the addition did not survive and deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer u/s 69A, allowing the assessee's appeal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

  2. The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

  3. Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

  4. Addition u/s 69A (unexplained money) was deleted as the assessee explained the source for purchasing property from capital contribution by partners. Addition u/s 68...

  5. Difference between purchase value and value determined by District Valuation Officer though more than 5% but below 10% of purchase consideration, transacted amount...

  6. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) - difference between the stamp duty value and purchase value of agricultural land (immovable property) - the agricultural land purchased...

  7. Cash deposits during the demonetization period were recorded in the books of accounts, with the source maintained. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 69A and charged...

  8. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii) r.w.s. 69 - difference between the purchase price i.e. circle rate/stamp duty value and the value determined by the DVO - This section can be...

  9. Section 69A addition for unexplained income treated as advances was rightly deleted as the loan amounts were recorded in books, supported by bank statements and...

  10. Issue of benami property transactions and the appellant's failure to prove the source of income for acquiring properties worth Rs. 1,41,37,500/-. The Initiating Officer...

  11. The assessee made investments in two firms by purchasing cold storage units funded by M/s. A.R. Constructions, where the assessee is a managing partner. The source for...

  12. Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - onus to prove - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided evidence to support the source of...

  13. Unexplained cash credit addition rightly deleted as amount credited in sales account and offered as income. Non-genuine purchases addition rightly deleted based on...

  14. Addition u/s 56(2)(viia)(ii) - determination of fair market value of shares - Method of valuation - Addition towards difference between FMV and actual amount paid for...

  15. Income from other sources - Addition on account of difference between sale consideration of property purchased by assessee and the guideline value of the said property...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates