The court held that the respondent authority cannot adjudicate a ...

Business can't face double jeopardy - GST authorities can't demand ITC reversal if DGGI already initiated proceedings on same issue.

Case Laws GST

September 30, 2024

The court held that the respondent authority cannot adjudicate a demand for reversal of input tax credit (ITC) on non-business transactions and exempt supplies, when the same issue is already subject to separate proceedings initiated by the Director General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). As the period covered under the impugned order overlaps with the show cause notice issued by the DGGI, both proceedings cannot continue simultaneously. Consequently, the impugned demand for reversal of ITC was set aside, and the petition was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The court held that the respondent authority cannot adjudicate a ...

Business can't face double jeopardy - GST authorities can't demand ITC reversal if DGGI already initiated proceedings on same issue.

Case Laws GST

September 30, 2024

You may also like:

Power of CGST Authority / DGGI over State GST authorities - Attachment of Bank accounts - conflict with the notification issued by the CBEC from time to time, concerning...

Double jeopardy - penalty is civil in nature imposed by the statutory authority - criminal action even otherwise being not violative of Article 20(2) - argument of...

Entitlement to claim input tax credit - The AAR concluded that the applicant is not entitled to claim ITC for expenses incurred specifically for the restaurant service...

The High Court addressed the issue of parallel proceedings initiated by both State and Central GST Authorities against the petitioner for the same assessment years. For...

Excess utilisation of cenvat credit - Whether the appellant is liable to pay interest and penalty on account of alleged excess utilisation of cenvat credit - The demand...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Simultaneous investigation by the Central and State GST authorities - The petitioner argued that the DGGI's actions violated a circular mandating coordination between...

Challenge to the State GST authorities demanding input tax credit availed by the petitioner along with interest and penalty for IGST paid on manpower supply services...

Rejection of application for Advance Ruling - Levy of GST - The appellate authority observed that the rejection of the advance ruling application was based on the...

Rectification of errors in filing GST Returns - The case involved errors made by the petitioner in their GST returns for the period July 2017, initially by incorrectly...

Jurisdiction - appropriate authority to complete the proceedings - state authority or central authority - although the action was undertaken under Section 67 of the Act...

Validity of reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) during investigation / search proceedings - In the present case, the petitioner has stoutly disputed that the reversal of...

The summary highlights the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to the non-electronic filing of Form GST ITC-02 by the transferor company. The key points are: Section...

The respondent commenced a real estate project "Swastik Heights" in the post-GST regime, with commencement certificate issued on 08.03.2018 and GST registration...

Exemption from GST - pure services or supply of goods to the Notified Area Authority, Vapi - Notified Area Authority, Vapi is a “local authority” or “governmental...

Quick Updates: