Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority had jurisdiction ...


Adjudicating Authority's Jurisdiction Affirmed in Asset Dispute During Insolvency Resolution; Appeal Dismissed.

November 18, 2024

Case Laws     IBC     AT

The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority had jurisdiction to determine whether the subject land is an asset of the corporate debtor, as such questions arise out of or relate to the insolvency resolution process. The proceedings conducted by the Sole Arbitrator and the orders passed did not amount to an arbitral award under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, and thus were not binding on the parties. The IRP/RP could rightly include the subject land in the Information Memorandum/CIRP process by virtue of Section 18(1)(f) explanation, as the corporate debtor claimed development rights over the land. The Adjudicating Authority did not err in allowing the intervention petition filed by Art Construction Pvt. Ltd. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to adjudicate upon a closure notice issued prior to the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's rejection of the Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor. The key points are: The Operational...

  3. HC affirmed that challenges to show cause notice under Section 74 of CGST/SGST Acts should be addressed before Adjudicating Authority. The petitioner's contentions...

  4. The Noida authority had terminated the lease deed of the subject land prior to the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of the Corporate...

  5. Initiation of CIRP - pre-existing dispute - the Adjudicating Authority has erred by not considering the various e-mails communication exchanged between the corporate...

  6. Maintainability of application - initiation of CIRP - The Adjudicating Authority has also recorded finding that claim for interest on the delayed payment is a disputed...

  7. Jurisdiction - rights of Adjudicating Authority to hear Objectors/ Interveners, before admission of the Application - The Scheme under Chapter III-A and the Regulations...

  8. The Corporate Debtor admitted outstanding operational debt owed to the Operational Creditor, citing adverse cash flow as the reason for non-payment, without attributing...

  9. The Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the Company Petition filed u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) on the ground of pre-existing disputes between...

  10. The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

  11. Initiation of CIRP - Period of Limitation - Exclusion of certain period - NCLT rejected the application - The Adjudicating Authority has committed error in rejecting the...

  12. CIRP proceedings - seeking payment of unpaid operational debt - Pre-existing dispute - The ‘Adjudicating Authority’ is not a Court of Law and the ‘CIRP’ is not an...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal examined whether there were sufficient grounds to recall its previous order dated 02.04.2024, wherein liberty was granted by the Supreme Court to...

  14. This summary concerns the maintainability of a fresh application u/s 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant had filed an application u/s 94 in 2020,...

  15. The NCLAT set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, holding: i) No fault in the assignment by lenders to Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. ii)...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates