Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Companies Law - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The Registrar of Companies, Chennai, acting as the Adjudicating ...


Penalty imposed on company & directors for non-compliance with securities allotment rules.

Case Laws     Companies Law

November 20, 2024

The Registrar of Companies, Chennai, acting as the Adjudicating Officer u/s 454(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, found non-compliance with Rule 14(6) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 by the company and its directors. Consequently, a penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the company and Rs. 10,000 on the officers in default, totaling Rs. 20,000, as prescribed u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. The penalty amount is to be paid online within 90 days of receiving the order, and proof of payment is to be submitted to the office.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Second Amendment Rules, 2019

  2. Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Amendment Rules, 2019

  3. Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) (Amendment) Rules, 2019

  4. Issue of securities in dematerialised form by unlisted public companies - New Rule 9A Inserted to the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014

  5. The High Court held that the penalty imposed on a company cannot be recovered from its former director u/s the Companies Act. The director cannot be held personally...

  6. Penalty imposed under FEMA for non-compliance with Paragraph 9(1)(B) of Schedule 1 to FEMA Regulations, 2000. Section 13 FEMA does not require intention for penalizing...

  7. This notification amends the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, by inserting a proviso in sub-rule (2) of rule 9B. The proviso states that a...

  8. Levy of penalty on the Director of Company - The adjudication order also is fallacious because the entire order proceeds on the basis that show cause notice has been...

  9. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  10. It was open for the Settlement Commission to impose penalty on the directors in addition to imposing penalty on the company, if there was material justifying imposition...

  11. The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

  12. Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

  13. Disqualification of a director of the financial creditor to sign the Section 7 application was challenged. The application u/s 7, signed by the director of the financial...

  14. Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

  15. Levy of penalty upon the Director of appellant’s company and upon Head of Finance and Accounts of the appellants’ company and upon the company itself - The SCN is held...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates