The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority violated ...

Tribunal faults lack of reasons in interim order; allows fresh plea to vacate stay.

December 10, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law AT

The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority violated principles of natural justice by failing to consider rival contentions and assign reasons for either accepting or rejecting arguments while granting an interim order u/ss 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT allowed the appellant to file a stay vacation application before the Adjudicating Authority within one week. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to decide the stay vacation application within three weeks, considering all contentions and assigning reasons for granting or denying the interim order. The observations made by the NCLAT or the impugned order were not to influence the decision on the stay vacation application.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority violated ...

Tribunal faults lack of reasons in interim order; allows fresh plea to vacate stay.

December 10, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law AT

You may also like:

The main order rejecting condonation of delay lacks reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is a well-settled legal position that an affidavit-in-reply...

NCLT Mumbai's order vacating attachment orders issued by ED under PMLA upheld. Petitioner, aware of CIRP proceedings, failed to avail statutory remedy of appeal before...

Extension of stay beyond the period of 365 days - Power of Tribunal to extend stay - No law can be so unfair as to say that if the Court/Tribunal is at fault, the...

Recovery of penalty against the company/ partnership firm - Cenvat Credit - Application seeking to vacate the interim relief - There is no good reason to vacate the...

Stay on demand - Since the Order of the Tribunal is not complied with and the disposal of appeals are delayed on the default of the assessee because assessee has been...

Stay of recovery of dues, pending the appeal - When substantial rights of parties are involved, it is not open to the 1st respondent to (i) mention wrong facts while...

ITAT recalled its earlier order due to discovery of inadvertent errors, specifically the reliance on non-existing case laws identified during suo-moto review. Exercising...

Disallowance of research and development expenses - the AO as well as the CIT (A) has disallowed the R & D claim made by the assessee mainly for the reason that no...

ITAT set aside additions made under s.56(2)(x)(b) regarding alleged undervaluation of immovable properties purchased below stamp duty value. The Tribunal found both...

Transfer of case u/s 127(2)(a) - If the petitioner was really aggrieved by a one-line SCN which did not indicate any reasons for the proposal - the petitioner could have...

The court quashed the impugned orders rejecting the appeal as the appellate authority failed to assign any reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is...

Stay of recovery proceedings initiated under Section 226(3) - Political Party claiming exemption u/s 13A as appliable to Trusts, denied - The tribunal dismissed these...

Petition filed under Article 226 challenging non-constitution of Tribunal and seeking stay on recovery of tax. State authorities acknowledged non-constitution and issued...

Power of tribunal to extend the stay beyond the period of 365 days - Once the proviso to Section 35C(2A) of the Act has been omitted, the embargo upon the Tribunal to...

The appellants challenged the order contravening FEMA for unauthorized direct investment outside India in an overseas JV not engaged in bona fide business activity. They...

Quick Updates: