Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2024 Year 2024 This

The CESTAT held that the appellant, who declared the description ...


Customs Tribunal exonerates importer from penalties due to DGFT's acceptance of goods description.

December 10, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     AT

The CESTAT held that the appellant, who declared the description of goods to the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) for obtaining the VKGUY license, did not have any mala fide intention. The issue of classification of goods is a matter of interpretation, and the DGFT had the opportunity to object to the description declared by the appellant while issuing the license. Since the DGFT accepted the declared description and issued the license, and the license has not been canceled, the penal provisions cannot be invoked against the appellant. Consequently, the appellant is not liable for penalties u/s 112(a) or 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962, and the penalties were set aside. The appeal was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appellant's customs broker (CB) license revocation, penalty imposition, and security deposit forfeiture were challenged for alleged violations of Regulations 10(a),...

  2. Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

  3. Duty demand u/s 28(1) of Customs Act, 1962, upon importer and transferee of license issued by DGFT - Liability of transferee for fraudulently obtained license - Levy of...

  4. The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

  5. The appellants, a customs warehousing station, faced a fire incident resulting in the loss of certain goods. The customs duty amount on the lost goods was paid by the...

  6. Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

  7. Re-classification of Thorn - The Tribunal upheld the reclassification of the imported goods to CTI 76020090, agreeing with the authorities that the original...

  8. Cancellation of MEIS scrips - Re- classification of the goods - Export of “Lamda Cyhalothrin Technical” - The Tribunal upheld the appellant's classification, emphasizing...

  9. The appellant had correctly declared the description of the imported goods as "Surgical Microscope for Neurosurgery - Zeiss OPMI Pentero with accessories" in the Bill of...

  10. The Customs Broker (CB) was alleged to have violated Regulation 10(n) of the Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2018, for failing to verify the antecedents and actual...

  11. Levy of penalty u/s 117 of Customs Act - mis-declaration of quantity and description of goods in the Bills of lading - The goods were lying in the port after unloading...

  12. Levy of Penalty on Customs Broker - pre-condition to restore the license - The case revolves around a Customs Broker who handled the clearance of household goods without...

  13. Classification of imported goods - plastic regrind - waste or not - restricted goods or prohibited goods - The Tribunal acknowledges the restrictions on the import of...

  14. Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

  15. Levy of penalty on customs broker - The Customs Broker has a very important position and has to safeguard the interest of both the importer and the Customs - The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates