The High Court held that the assessment order u/ss 144 and 144B ...

Income Tax assessment order u/ss 144 and 144B quashed over lack of proper notice.

December 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The High Court held that the assessment order u/ss 144 and 144B cannot be completed without issuing a notice u/s 143(2). Reliance on the petitioner's PAN database or an alternate email address cannot substitute for statutory compliance. Procedural irregularities in issuing and serving notices undermine the jurisdiction and legality of the entire assessment process. Consequently, the assessment order passed by the respondent authorities without issuing a proper notice u/s 143(2) was declared bad in law and set aside. The High Court quashed the impugned assessment order, demand notice, and penalty notices, directing the respondent authorities to issue fresh notices, if deemed necessary, strictly adhering to statutory provisions and ensuring proper service to the petitioner.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court held that the assessment order u/ss 144 and 144B ...

Income Tax assessment order u/ss 144 and 144B quashed over lack of proper notice.

December 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court quashed the assessment order passed u/s 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B, as well as the consequential notices u/ss 156 and 274 read with 271AA(1) of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashed the assessment order u/s 144/147 and the demand notice u/s 156, treating them as non-existent due to the failure to mention the...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

Ex parte order passed based on old PAN number challenged. Society contended all transactions accounted for in audited books, returns filed with new PAN. Department...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Validity of assessment completed u/s 144 - absence of notice - Since the notices were not received back “unserved” within thirty days of its issuance, there would be...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

Best Judgement assessment u/s 144 - Estimation of income - The Assessing Officer issued notices under section 143(2) as well as various notices issued under sections...

Validity of notice proposing for Best Judgement assessment u/s 144 - Failure to file ITR in response to notice u/s 148 r.w.s. 142(1) due to medical reasons and recovery...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Income-tax Officer (Intelligence) authority to issue notice u/s 133(6) - Jurisdiction of Income Tax Authorities u/s 120 - From the reliance on the notification dated...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Petitioner received another notice u/s 148A(b) once again, alleging escapement of income - The High Court quashed and set aside the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147- non-issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - Non filing of ITR within thirty days after issue of notice u/s. 148 - though the assessee did not file...

Validity of Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - Penalty proceeding as independent of the assessment proceeding - absence of satisfaction recorded in the reassessment u/s 147...

The appellant trust claimed to be formed for public charitable activities and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act 1959, regularly filing its income tax...

Quick Updates: