Sensitive information gathered by Intelligence Department ...

Intelligence Dept needn't disclose sensitive info for raids; justified to protect third-party rights & market stability.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Sensitive information gathered by Intelligence Department forming basis of search operation need not be disclosed to petitioners. Withholding such information does not violate principles of natural justice. Source of information collected by Intelligence Department crucial for maintaining confidentiality and integrity of investigative processes. SC in T. TAKANO case emphasized safeguarding sensitive information obtained during investigations to protect third-party rights, market stability and investor interests. Principles of natural justice do not entail right to indiscriminate disclosures where sensitive third-party interests involved. Investigative authority to balance noticee's right to disclosure with imperative to protect third-party rights and market stability. HC concludes withholding of sensitive information justified, does not breach natural justice as relied upon documents provided to petitioner. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Sensitive information gathered by Intelligence Department ...

Intelligence Dept needn't disclose sensitive info for raids; justified to protect third-party rights & market stability.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid. The assessee, a partner in a firm, had disclosed all financial transactions and...

Income-tax Officer (Intelligence) authority to issue notice u/s 133(6) - Jurisdiction of Income Tax Authorities u/s 120 - From the reliance on the notification dated...

Validity of reopening of assessment - reopening beyond period of four years - reason to believe - Old regime - Once the primary facts are disclosed by the assessee, the...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - the Explanation to the sub-section has nothing to do with “inferences” and deals only with the question whether primary...

Ministry Of Finance declares GST Database & infrastructure installed at GSTN as protected - Notification

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

The High Court addressed a challenge to summons issued u/s 81 of TNVAT Act, 2006 in Form PP to petitioners for document submission. Petitioner argued Form PP applies...

Constitutional Validity of Rule 37(8) - Rejection of conversion of the Petitioner's company from an “Unlimited Liability Company” to a “Limited Liability Company” - The...

Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner's contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated...

The text defines key terms related to insider trading regulations for mutual funds, such as connected persons, generally available information, insider, systematic...

Validity of direction of special audit – AO was justified in holding that the interest of the revenue had to be protected by ordering a special audit - HC

Raid - validity of search and seizure proceedings - attachment of Bank Accounts - the said principle does not apply insofar as an attachment made to protect the interest...

The High Court held that the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and its officials were unjustified in refusing to consider manually corrected shipping bills for...

Bogus purchases - G.P. addition - if the AO finds that the GP disclosed in respect of purchases from these three parties is lower than the GP disclosed in respect of...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the four-year period. The Assessing Officer failed to record a finding that the...

Quick Updates: