Impugned order quashed and matter remanded for fresh ...

Flawed tax liability order revoked; remanded for fresh review considering reply & reasoning.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Impugned order quashed and matter remanded for fresh consideration. HC found non-application of mind, non-consideration of Petitioner's reply to show cause notice, and lack of reasoning in passing order u/s 168-A of CGST Act read with DGST Act for failure to declare correct tax liability in GSTR-09. Relying on coordinate bench judgments in Indian Highways and Chetak Logistic, HC held impugned order untenable for being passed in cavalier manner without deciding on merits, thereby violating principles of natural justice.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Impugned order quashed and matter remanded for fresh ...

Flawed tax liability order revoked; remanded for fresh review considering reply & reasoning.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Judicial review of an assessment order was conducted due to discrepancies between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns. The petitioner's replies were not considered, violating...

Assessment orders quashed due to petitioner's illness, remanded for fresh orders. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days. Cases remitted to...

The High Court examined the validity of an assessment order issued without considering the reply submitted by the assessee in response to a Show Cause Notice. It was...

The main order rejecting condonation of delay lacks reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is a well-settled legal position that an affidavit-in-reply...

The High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice due to a non-speaking order by the adjudicating authority, which ignored the petitioner's replies and...

Validity of remand of matter to the AA to pass fresh order - It is settled principles of law that every decision is to be supported by reasons inasmuch as reasoning is...

The High Court found that the respondents failed to properly consider the petitioner's contentions regarding the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of its...

The High Court quashed the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax u/s 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, citing violation of...

Challenge to an order issued under Form GST DRC-07 for the difference in tax amount between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. The impugned orders were passed without considering the...

Validity of Orders passed u/s 73 - excess claim of Input Tax Credit [ITC] - Inadequate Consideration of Replies - The Court noted that the Proper Officer appeared to...

The High Court allowed the petition by way of remand due to violation of principles of natural justice by the 4th Respondent. While the Petitioner's reply to the...

Reopening of assessment - Notice issued u/s 148A(b) - By not considering the reply of the Petitioner dated 31st March, 2022, the mandate of Section 148A(c) of the Act...

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before passing an order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act,...

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner...

The High Court considered whether a slump sale under the BTA would be taxable as a sale of goods u/s the MVAT Act. The reviewing authority exceeded its jurisdiction by...

Quick Updates: