Appellant failed to comply with labelling requirements under ...

Goods confiscated for non-compliance with labelling rules; CESTAT reduces penalties.

January 4, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

Appellant failed to comply with labelling requirements under Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 and Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014 by not producing Registration Certificate upon goods' arrival, rendering goods liable for confiscation u/s 111(d) and penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962. CESTAT partly allowed appeal, reducing redemption fine to Rs.30,000/- and penalty to Rs.5,000/- considering procedural delay in obtaining Registration Certificate after goods' arrival.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellant failed to comply with labelling requirements under ...

Goods confiscated for non-compliance with labelling rules; CESTAT reduces penalties.

January 4, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Seeking re-export of goods - Absolute confiscation of goods - breach of ‘intellectual property rights’ - The tribunal found that while the goods were correctly...

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default of non-compliance of the statutory notice issued under section 142(1) r.w.s. 129 - where the assessment order was finally passed u/s...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of statutory notices - since the order was passed by the AO u/s. 143(3) and not 144 means the subsequent compliance in the...

Import of goods (wine) - food safety - Labelling Requirement - Assessee would have to comply with a number of conditions like providing details to comply with the local...

Imposition of penalty - Smuggling - Gold bars of foreign origin - illegally imported goods - CESTAT held that, once the two Appellants disputed the fact of recovery of...

Jurisdiction - Power to confiscate goods - The power to detain under Section 129 cannot be converted to a proceeding under Section 130 of the Act since both these...

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - assessee failed to give reasons for non-compliance of statutory notice u/s. 142(1) - till the disposal of appeal by the CIT(A) the assessee...

Quick Updates: