Petitioner's stay and review applications rejected without ...

Authorities Failed to Provide Reasoned Orders on Stay and Review Applications, Matter Remanded.

January 4, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Petitioner's stay and review applications rejected without reasoned and speaking orders by respondents. HC held AO did not follow correct procedure in deciding applications as per precedents. Matter remitted to respondent No. 2 to consider stay/review applications afresh.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner's stay and review applications rejected without ...

Authorities Failed to Provide Reasoned Orders on Stay and Review Applications, Matter Remanded.

January 4, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

HC set aside the order requiring mandatory 20% deposit of disputed tax demand as precondition for stay application hearing. The court found this requirement violated...

Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority's order cryptic, failing to examine appellants' defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction....

The High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice due to a non-speaking order by the adjudicating authority, which ignored the petitioner's replies and...

The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority violated principles of natural justice by failing to consider rival contentions and assign reasons for either accepting or...

The main order rejecting condonation of delay lacks reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is a well-settled legal position that an affidavit-in-reply...

HC examined proceedings under Section 73 of UP GST Act regarding disputed input tax credit claims. The authority initially rejected certificates filed per Government...

Stay of demand - The High Court acknowledged that the grant of stay is within discretionary jurisdiction, and it does not sit in appeal over such discretion. The Court...

Impugned communication rejecting application for input tax credit blocking lacked reasoning, amounting to non-application of mind and violation of natural justice...

Cancellation of registration by adjudicating authority without assigning reasons and without application of mind violates principles of natural justice and Article 14 of...

Validity of remand of matter to the AA to pass fresh order - It is settled principles of law that every decision is to be supported by reasons inasmuch as reasoning is...

The court quashed the impugned orders rejecting the appeal as the appellate authority failed to assign any reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is...

Order for cancellation of registration passed without providing opportunity of hearing or assigning reasons violates principles of natural justice. Coordinate Bench...

Impugned order suffers from non-application of mind, violation of principles of natural justice. Tribunal failed to consider grounds raised by petitioner for delay in...

Reasoned Order - Exemption of Duty – Reasons are a soul of any judicial order and good and proper reasoning makes its body strong - Court remands the matter back to Tribunal - HC

The NCLAT set aside the adjudicating authority's mechanical admission of a Section 95 application, finding a lack of independent assessment. The tribunal emphasized that...

Quick Updates: