The ITAT quashed the order of the Pr. CIT, holding that the ...

Income Tax Exemption on Differential Between Stamp Duty Valuation and Purchase Price Under Joint Development Agreement.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT quashed the order of the Pr. CIT, holding that the addition u/s 56(2)(x) on differential between stamp duty valuation and purchase price was not justified. The ITAT observed that the AO had enquired and was satisfied with the assessee's contention regarding the Joint Development Agreement (JDA). The ITAT noted that taxable income u/s 45(5A) would arise only upon obtaining a completion certificate, which was not the case here. The ITAT found that the Pr. CIT's order was based on assumptions without backing of facts, contrary to the prudent businessman principle. Consequently, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT quashed the order of the Pr. CIT, holding that the ...

Income Tax Exemption on Differential Between Stamp Duty Valuation and Purchase Price Under Joint Development Agreement.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee purchased agricultural land whose stamp duty valuation was lower than the actual purchase consideration. The authorities sought to invoke section 56(2)(x)...

Addition of income u/s 56(2)(x)(b)(B) - under valuation of stamp duty value on purchase consideration of the property u/s 50C - The assessee asserts that only a partial...

CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

Benami transaction - availability of joint family property or income - joint family acquisition - Purchase of property in the name of wife (Mrs. A) - Presumption of...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii) r.w.s. 69 - difference between the purchase price i.e. circle rate/stamp duty value and the value determined by the DVO - This section can be...

Charitable institution invested funds in shares of joint venture companies, violating Section 13(1)(d). Exemption u/s 11 denied for income from such investment. However,...

The assessee had been following the mercantile system of accounting, wherein book profits are taken for tax assessment, though credit or debit amounts may not be...

Refund of stamp duty - Stamp papers purchased for registration of immovable property but the same could not be executed - The denial of refund of the stamp duty...

This case deals with the levy of deficit stamp duty and penalty in a court-conducted auction sale. The key points are: In a court-supervised auction sale, the stamp...

Transfer Pricing Adjustments - Purchase of Development Rights - capital transactions and their treatment - The tribunal addressed several crucial issues regarding the...

The Supreme Court interpreted the definition of "purchase price" u/s 2(18) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (GVAT Act). It held that purchases on which value...

Levy of stamp duty on schemes of amalgamation or restructuring - The High court found that orders of the court sanctioning amalgamation/restructuring, along with the...

Revision u/s 263 - error noted by the CIT that sale of properties by the assessee during the year was not examined by the AO vis-à-vis its stamp duty value for the...

The order dealt with maintainability of petition, liability to pay stamp duty on NCLT order, applicability of res judicata principle, interpretation of fiscal laws,...

HC quashed orders rejecting assessee's request for revision u/s 264. Differential value between sale deed and stamp duty valuation exceeded Rs. 50,000, invoking Section...

Quick Updates: