Petitioner challenged impugned order by respondent regarding ...

Tax Demand Challenged Over Filing Discrepancies; Court Orders Partial Payment and Objections Within Four Weeks.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

Petitioner challenged impugned order by respondent regarding difference in outward supply between GSTR 3B and books of accounts, non-filing of GSTR 9 & 9C, non-payment of tax under RCM for freight charges, and non-payment of tax for private coaching fee receipts. HC held petitioner shall pay 25% of demand after deducting paid amount, subject to verification. Impugned order treated as show cause notice; petitioner to file objections within four weeks. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner challenged impugned order by respondent regarding ...

Tax Demand Challenged Over Filing Discrepancies; Court Orders Partial Payment and Objections Within Four Weeks.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Stay of demand - payment of 20% of the outstanding demand - ITAT rejecting its application for stay on the recovery of demand during the pendency of appeal - The Delhi...

Seeking service tax refund for payment of VAT liability - he petitioner had made the payment of the service tax for the periods in question voluntarily and had never...

Applicability: The waiver provisions u/s 128A apply to cases involving tax demands u/s 73 for financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, and cases involving...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

HC accepted petitioner's alternative proposal to pay additional 5% of outstanding tax demand for AY 2011-12, bringing total payment to 20% of assessed amount. This...

Eligibility for Input Tax Credit - Failure to report outward supply - The objection of the petitioner is that most of these items do not fall within the reverse charge...

Stay of demand - condition precedent for the grant of stay of the demand - Out of three Assessment Years, for AY 2012-13, as stated above, the petitioner has made an...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

Default u/s 201 - demand notices challenged by the petitioners on the ground that the tax that has been demanded as arrears of tax from the petitioners Tax Deducted at...

Provisional attachment of goods - bogus invoices - writ court granted relief to the respondent - as on date, the respondent have not complied with the order passed by...

Permission to withdraw application filed u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was denied, and the Appellant challenged the order contending error in not...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

HC dismissed writ petition challenging reassessment proceedings under Section 147. Court declined jurisdiction noting petitioner's failure to raise TOLA provisions...

Waiver of interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C - marginal delay in filing the returns - The petitioner sought relief based on the timing of filing returns after receiving...

CESTAT adjudicated a service tax dispute involving multiple service providers. The tribunal partially allowed the appellant's appeal, exempting services provided to...

Quick Updates: