The HC held that issuing a consolidated show cause notice for ...

Consolidated GST notice for multiple years invalid, separate notices required per year.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

The HC held that issuing a consolidated show cause notice for multiple assessment years from 2019 to 2023-24 was erroneous. It relied on precedents from Karnataka and Madras HCs which held that separate notices should be issued for each year u/s 73 of the GST Act. The HC granted an extension till 21.11.2024 for filing a reply to the 1622-page notice and excluded the corresponding period for passing orders to offset the delay.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC held that issuing a consolidated show cause notice for ...

Consolidated GST notice for multiple years invalid, separate notices required per year.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

GST dispute involving misclassification of two-wheeler seats - petitioner challenged bunching of show cause notices for multiple assessment years - HC allowed splitting...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

Consolidated show cause notices for multiple assessment years contravene provisions of CGST Act and legal precedents. Impugned notices grouping demand from 2017 to 2023...

The High Court set aside the show cause notice and summary issued by the respondent u/s 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for multiple financial years...

Validity of consolidated Notice issued u/s 153A r.w.s. 153C/143(2) - Under these sections, the Assessing Officer cannot issue consolidated notices for different...

The High Court held that the show cause notices issued by the respondent u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, were flawed due to the improper...

Delay of 10 years for adjudicating the case - Liability of cess on bringing goods within the limits of Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation - since the Commissioner failed...

Re-assessment - Time limitation for notices issued - period of limitation enhanced from 5 years to 6 years - Prospective or retrospective amendment - 5 year period...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Notice issued for reopening assessment u/s 147 was beyond the limitation period stipulated in Section 149(1). The High Court, following Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Limited,...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The tribunal sided with the assessee on the key issue of the legality of the re-assessment notice under section 148. It was...

The ITAT held that the notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid and quashed it. For the relevant assessment year 2017-18, the time limit of three years lapsed on...

The ITAT held that the period of limitation for issuing a notice u/s 153C is six years from the end of the financial year preceding the date of recording satisfaction....

Sanction by specified authority not obtained as per amended provisions of Section 151 for reopening assessment beyond 3 years, rendering impugned notice invalid;...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Quick Updates: