Appellant's appeal allowed. CESTAT held when main case settled ...

Excise penalty on co-noticee set aside after main case settled under SVLDRS.

January 9, 2025

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Appellant's appeal allowed. CESTAT held when main case settled under SVLDRS 2019, penalties on co-noticees in same case unsustainable. Relying on division bench judgments, CESTAT set aside penalty imposed on appellant co-noticee u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 as main noticee's case settled under SVLDRS 2019.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellant's appeal allowed. CESTAT held when main case settled ...

Excise penalty on co-noticee set aside after main case settled under SVLDRS.

January 9, 2025

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - charge of abating the evasion of duty by the Main Party - The appellant argued that since the main party's case of duty...

Once the main demand of duty case is settled under the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS) 2019, penalties imposed on co-noticees cannot be...

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

The appellant paid excise duty on the removal of inputs as such, based on the transaction value. However, this excise duty was found to be in excess of the actual CENVAT...

SVLDRS - It is a peculiar case wherein personal hearing under the scheme could not take place for the errors which are not attributable to the petitioners, resulting in...

Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

SVLDRS - rejection on the ground that the demand was not finally quantified nor communicated to the party on or before 30.06.2019 - The Scheme covers not only cases...

Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded...

Cross Utilization of CENVAT Credit - wrong utilization of Additional Duty of Excise (T&TA) for the payment of Basic Excise Duty and AED (GOSI) - levy of interest...

The ITAT decided in favor of the assessee. The Central Excise Directorate had issued a show-cause notice alleging that the assessee had claimed CENVAT credit on bogus...

Income Tax: In best judgment cases where taxpayers remain unresponsive to the Faceless Assessing Officer, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall be empowered to set aside the...

Compounding of offence - Criminal case u/s 276C(1) read with Section 277 and 278B - The authority to issue instructions or directions by the Board stems from the second...

Refund - Excess amount deposited SVLDRS as Voluntary Disclosure Scheme - SVLDRS- 2/SVLDRS-2B has not been placed on record. It becomes clear that appellant has failed to...

Quick Updates: