Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2020 Year 2020 This

Maintainability of Application for Settlement application - ...


Co-applicant can seek settlement; not barred by prior penalty as they're not the main SCN recipient.

March 7, 2020

Case Laws     Central Excise     Commission

Maintainability of Application for Settlement application - co-applicant - Since he is not the main applicant in the present case, he will not be debarred from approaching the Settlement Commission. Had he been the main applicant in this case to whom a duty demand has been issued in the form of a SCN, he would have been barred from approaching the Commission as he was penalised earlier in the settlement of another case relating to him where a SCN was issued to him demanding duty - Commission

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Once the main demand of duty case is settled under the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS) 2019, penalties imposed on co-noticees cannot be...

  2. Where against main noticee/defaulter, the Settlement Commission has granted immunity from payment of any penalty, no penalty can be imposed upon other co-noticees - HC

  3. Penalty imposed u/s 112(a) - Import confectionary items from Dubai - immunity from prosecution and fine/penalty - Tribunal held that since the appellant was a co-noticee...

  4. Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

  5. Penalty u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - charge of abating the evasion of duty by the Main Party - The appellant argued that since the main party's case of duty...

  6. Extended period of limitation - Merely that assessee is PSU is not sufficient to set aside the SCN as being barred by time - SCN not barred by time.

  7. Appellant's appeal allowed. CESTAT held when main case settled under SVLDRS 2019, penalties on co-noticees in same case unsustainable. Relying on division bench...

  8. Undervaluation - Import of “Whey Protein” - appellant deposited the entire amount prior to issue of demand - The Applicant and co-applicant are granted immunities from...

  9. Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act,...

  10. 10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

  11. Wrongful claim of Input tax credit - bogus supply - vague SCN - SCN did contain the details about the foundation of the case - principles of natural justice - From the...

  12. The Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued after more than ten years is time-barred, exceeding the extended period of limitation of five years provided u/s 28. The proposals in...

  13. Seeking grant of bail - Legality of arrest without assessing tax liability - Claiming fake input tax credits, without actually supplying goods - The High Court observed...

  14. Seeking withdrawal of main Insolvency and Bankruptcy Application - In the instant case on hand, the Committee of Creditors had voted under Section 12A of the Code...

  15. Seeking winding up of company - if an applicant is not in a position to satisfy on the point of just and equitable ground, the tribunal may refuse to make an order for...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates