Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

CESTAT dismissed appeal and application for condonation of delay ...


Customs Tribunal Rejects 19-Month Delay Appeal u/s 35(1), Citing Lack of Justification and Recent Supreme Court Guidelines.

January 23, 2025

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

CESTAT dismissed appeal and application for condonation of delay of 1 year 7 months, finding no sufficient cause established. While courts generally view "sufficient cause" flexibly per Supreme Court guidelines in MST. KATIJI, each day's delay requires proper explanation. Appellant failed to provide even minimal justification for the substantial delay. Tribunal emphasized that condonation powers cannot be exercised mechanically without appropriate reasons. Following recent precedent in AJAY DABRA where SC rejected financial constraints as valid grounds, and considering AP HC's position limiting condonation beyond 90 days u/s 35(1), CESTAT concluded appellant failed to discharge obligation of demonstrating sufficient cause for delay.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with documentary evidence requirements was challenged by the assessee, citing COVID-19 restrictions as a reasonable...

  2. Validity of time limit for ailing benefit of input tax credit (ITC) - Section 16(4) of the CGST Act - The provision contained in Section 16(4) of the CGST Act is...

  3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

  4. Classification of goods - rate of tax - Namkeens or not - The Jackfruit Chips and Banana Chips are classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 2008.19.40 (Not as Namkeens)...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

  7. Penalty imposed u/s 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 for alleged abetment of illegal export by arranging lorries. Lack of admissible evidence showing knowledge of goods...

  8. Classification of goods - rate of tax - NAMKEENS or not - The Jackfruit Chips, Banana Chips, Potatoto Chips, Tapioca Chips, Chembu Chips and Pavakka Chips are...

  9. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of classifying imported Zinc as unwrought/unrefined under a specific customs tariff heading. The Tribunal rejected the demand...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal considered two main issues: 1. Addition u/s 37(1) - Assessee incurred business loss due to default in property payment, allowed as revenue loss. 2....

  11. Refund of Customs Duty - Duty paid under protest or not - section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 - The Tribunal held that it is the second proviso to section 27 (1) of the...

  12. Circular No. 36/2010-Customs dated 23.09.2010 issued under the Customs Act, 1962, specifically para 3(a), was struck down as ultra vires Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the...

  13. The court rejected the petitioner's application for condonation of a 216-day delay in filing their Income Tax Returns (ITRs). The reasons cited by the petitioner, delay...

  14. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Customs...

  15. GST Revenue collection in the month of April 2018 exceeds ₹ 1 Lakh Crore

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates