ITAT quashed revisionary proceedings under section 263 initiated ...

Tax Revision Rejected: Multiple Cash Deposits of Rs. 25,000 Each Explained Through Previous Year's Opening Balance

March 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT quashed revisionary proceedings under section 263 initiated by PCIT regarding unexplained cash deposits. While assessee had deposited Rs. 16 lacs in multiple transactions of Rs. 25,000 each, these amounts originated from opening cash balance pertaining to AY 2012-13. During reassessment under section 147, AO had conducted proper inquiries and obtained necessary explanations from assessee regarding bank deposits. ITAT held that since AO had taken a plausible view after due application of mind and specific verification, PCIT's revision order alleging non-application of mind was not sustainable. The tribunal emphasized that department could separately initiate proceedings under section 147 for AY 2012-13 if income had escaped assessment for that year.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT quashed revisionary proceedings under section 263 initiated ...

Tax Revision Rejected: Multiple Cash Deposits of Rs. 25,000 Each Explained Through Previous Year's Opening Balance

March 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

Petitioner pre-deposited Rs. 6,25,000/- as condition for filing appeal u/s 51 of TNVAT Act against Assessment Order dated 21.10.2010. After revised Assessment Order on...

SC upheld the Tribunal's compensation award in a motor accident death claim, restoring Rs. 58,24,000/- for father and Rs. 93,61,000/- for mother against claimed amounts...

The HC allowed the petition and quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of Rs. 40,00,000 deposited voluntarily by mistake. The HC held that the amount...

ITAT upheld addition under section 68 regarding unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 78,00,000/- as assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanation or supporting...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that cash found in two lockers belonged to RNB Temple Trust and Ram Bajaj Foundation. The Trust's balance sheet showed cash in...

Proprietorship concerns lack legal personhood; proprietor deemed necessary party. Proceeds of crime from VAT fraud laundered through multiple entities. Appellant's...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

The ITAT considered the issue of cash deposits and other credits in the assessee's saving bank account. The tribunal noted that the cash deposits were not made in a...

The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits,...

The case involved legality of assessment u/s 153A without search or Panchnama. The search warrant named the assessee company, rejecting the objection. No incriminating...

HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

Quick Updates: