NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging rejection of resolution plan. ...

Resolution Plan Rejected Due to Director's Disqualification Under Section 29A(e) IBC and Section 164(2) Companies Act

March 6, 2025

Case Laws Companies Law AT

NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging rejection of resolution plan. Appellant was ineligible under Section 29A(e) of IBC, 2016 as its director became disqualified under Section 164(2) of Companies Act, 2013 for failing to file financial statements and annual returns for three consecutive years. Appellant had withdrawn EMD after multiple reminders to RP and filed application for plan reconsideration after six months, indicating attempt to delay CIRP/liquidation process. CoC's commercial wisdom in rejecting plan and ordering liquidation was non-justiciable. NCLAT upheld NCLT's refusal to intervene in CoC's decision, finding no grounds to interfere with rejection of resolution plan.

View Source

← Previous Next →

NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging rejection of resolution plan. ...

Resolution Plan Rejected Due to Director's Disqualification Under Section 29A(e) IBC and Section 164(2) Companies Act

March 6, 2025

Case Laws Companies Law AT

You may also like:

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the Resolution Plan must provide for payment of Provident Fund and Gratuity dues in accordance with Section...

The NCLAT held that the requirement of obtaining a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from stock exchanges under Regulation 37(1) and (2) of the LODR (Listing Obligations...

Disqualification of a director of the financial creditor to sign the Section 7 application was challenged. The application u/s 7, signed by the director of the financial...

Eligibility to submit Resolution Plan - former promotor/director of the company - Ineligibility is being held only on the ground that Respondent No.2 was promoter of the...

Resolution plan approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) with 97.54% vote share. Commercial wisdom of CoC in approving resolution plan not to be lightly interfered with....

The NCLAT rejected the intervention application filed by the Appellant for approval of the Resolution Plan u/s 30 of the I&B Code. The Appellant was an unsuccessful...

The court held that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) rightly considered and rejected the resolution plan submitted by M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. and approved the...

Demand of KGST when the resolution plan was approved - Jurisdiction and applicability of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) over statutory dues. The court...

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

The High Court examined the issue of liability to clear statutory dues post-insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. The resolution plan...

This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

Approval of Resolution Plan - extinguishment of security interest and the guarantees - Resolution Plan in question has consciously dealt with securities and personal...

Approval of Resolution Plan - The Tribunal found the resolution plan’s treatment of operational creditors contrary to Section 30(2)(b) of the IBC, as operational...

Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

The jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Tribunal to interfere with the Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) is limited...

Quick Updates: