CESTAT upheld the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)'s decision ...

Commissioner's Review Order Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 129D(3) of Customs Act for Exceeding 90-Day Limitation Period

March 13, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT upheld the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)'s decision dismissing the Revenue's appeal as time-barred. The review order was passed 20 days beyond the 90-day limitation period prescribed under Section 129D(3) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Revenue failed to demonstrate that sufficient cause was shown to the Board to obtain the mandated extension of 30 days under the proviso to Section 129D(3), nor did it file any application for condonation of delay before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal ruled that non-compliance with statutory time limitations cannot be mechanically condoned without adherence to legal mandates, particularly when no justifiable reasons were presented.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT upheld the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)'s decision ...

Commissioner's Review Order Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 129D(3) of Customs Act for Exceeding 90-Day Limitation Period

March 13, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Intimation for composition levy - Provisional registration or new registration before 31.3.2018 - period of limitation extended from 90 days to 180 days - Rule 3 of the...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The consultant of the appellant has obtained a copy of the Order in Original on 16.12.2019. The appeal then has to be filed...

Revocation of CBL License - 90 days from the date of issuance of SCN is when the noticee submits reply within 30 days and in a case like this, when the noticee has not...

Customs broker's license revoked by Commissioner for breach of regulations. CESTAT allowed appeal, holding that failure to issue show cause notice within 90 days of...

Pronouncement of orders not within 90 days - Covid-19 epidemic - Even without the words “ordinarily”, in the light of the above analysis of the legal position, the...

Liquidation of Corporate debtor - time limitation - exclusion of time taken by Tribunal to decide to how the voting share of thousands of Allottees will be counted - the...

Due date for filing of Stock statement in FORM GST CMP-03 extended from 60 days to 90 days in case of a person opting for Composition scheme in GST. - See the amended Rule 3.

Income Tax: Limit of remuneration to working partners in partnership firms allowed as deduction increased - on first Rs 6,00,000 of book profit or loss, Rs 3,00,000 or...

Pronouncement of orders within 90 days after the conclusion of hearing - Covid-19 epidemic - Worldwide lockdown - We are of the considered view that rather than taking a...

Detention order - challenge on the short ground that the impugned proceedings are barred by the limitation prescribed under Section 129(3) of the GST Act, 2017 - the...

Order u/s 254 (1) passed beyond the period of 90 days from the date of conclusions of its hearing - Since, in the present case, the order has been pronounced one day...

Seeking extension of time, for 90 days’ time, with a Bonafide request - to extend the time, to pay the balance purchase consideration - The Appellant / Applicant either...

The notification GSR 383(E) dated 19.04.2018 amended the clause, which came into effect on the same date. The respondent Directorate had 90 days from 19.04.2018 to file...

The notification GSR 383(E) dated 19.04.2018 amended the relevant clause, which came into effect on the date of publication. Consequently, the Directorate had 90 days...

Revokation of CHA licence and forfeiture of security - As per Regulation 20, statutory time limit prescribed for issuance of show cause notice is 90 days of offence report - AT

Quick Updates: