HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, holding that the ...

Refund Claim Upheld: Tax Calculation Validates Petitioner's Entitlement to Rs. 8,848 in Budgetary Support Amounts

April 9, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, holding that the rejection of Rs. 1,678/- for July-September 2021 and Rs. 7,170/- for January-March 2022 quarters was improper. The court determined that the budgetary support calculation under the scheme was correctly applied, with entitlement calculated at 58% of central tax paid through cash ledger and 29% of IGST paid. The respondent was directed to release the inadmissible amounts in accordance with the notification dated 05.10.2017, effectively granting the petitioner's full refund claim.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, holding that the ...

Refund Claim Upheld: Tax Calculation Validates Petitioner's Entitlement to Rs. 8,848 in Budgetary Support Amounts

April 9, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, finding the rejection of budgetary support refund claims invalid. The court held that the calculation of 58% central tax and 29% IGST...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

Transitioning unutilized input tax credit under the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - error in claiming input tax credit of unadjusted TDS. The High Court held...

DGFT has introduced an online module for filing Annual RoDTEP Return (ARR) on its portal for exporters who claimed RoDTEP benefits exceeding Rs. 1 crore in FY 2023-24....

HC adjudicated a tax refund dispute involving budgetary support claims under CGST Act, 2017. The court found the respondent's rejection of partial refund claims...

Dispute centered on Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules regarding input tax credit (ITC) calculations following tax rate reduction on iron and steel goods. SC upheld HC's...

Refund of Service Tax - time limitation - Exercise of power u/s 142(3) of GST Act for refund of service tax - The case involves the rejection of a refund claim by the...

The appellant paid service tax voluntarily under reverse charge mechanism before the GST regime. The adjudicating authority denied refund, holding that service tax was...

HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, holding that the rejection of Rs. 2,195/- by the respondent was improper and contrary to the budgetary support scheme...

Transitional credit of input tax available under VAT Act sought. State contended refund application pursuant to Annexure-P/15 required. Court held refund of Rs....

The summary focuses on the refund claim rejection based on the ground that the amount paid under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) is not admissible u/r 9(1)(bb) of CENVAT...

The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

Rejection of the petitioner’s claim for budgetary support - Violation of principles of natural justice - The court emphasized that the Budgetary Support Scheme mandated...

Refund of services tax / Cenvat Credit - tax deposited under reverse charge mechanism, pursuant to audit objection - revenue neutrality - Post GST regime - From a...

Refund claim of service tax paid - classification of services - Claiming a refund of the amount paid as tax as per their understanding of law cannot be disputed now -...

Quick Updates: