HC ruled in favor of petitioner, finding the rejection of ...

Tax Refund Victory: Petitioner Wins Challenge Against Rejected Budgetary Support Claims Under Notification 05.10.2017

April 9, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, finding the rejection of budgetary support refund claims invalid. The court held that the calculation of 58% central tax and 29% IGST paid through cash ledger was correctly applied. The respondent's rejection of Rs. 31,456/- for July-September 2021 and Rs. 69,684/- for January-March 2022 quarters was deemed contrary to the notification dated 05.10.2017. The court directed respondent to release the inadmissible amounts, effectively granting the petitioner's refund claims in full.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, finding the rejection of ...

Tax Refund Victory: Petitioner Wins Challenge Against Rejected Budgetary Support Claims Under Notification 05.10.2017

April 9, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, holding that the rejection of Rs. 2,195/- by the respondent was improper and contrary to the budgetary support scheme...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

Rejection of petitioner’s claim for benefit of budgetary support - If the provisions of the Scheme Notification are given the meaning as sought to be done by the...

HC adjudicated a tax refund dispute involving budgetary support claims under CGST Act, 2017. The court found the respondent's rejection of partial refund claims...

HC affirmed tax authority's adjustment of AY 2010-11 refund against pre-existing tax liabilities of corporate debtor. Resolution applicant's claim to refund rejected on...

Rejection of the petitioner’s claim for budgetary support - Violation of principles of natural justice - The court emphasized that the Budgetary Support Scheme mandated...

Refund claim of service tax paid - classification of services - Claiming a refund of the amount paid as tax as per their understanding of law cannot be disputed now -...

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment...

Refund claim - rejected on the ground that the appellant cannot claim the refund directly without challenging the assessment order (bill of entry) - refund cannot be denied - AT

Area Based Exemption - Denial of budgetary support - It is material to note that it is not disputed that but for the controversy whether the petitioner was availing the...

Refund claim for service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on transportation of raw material was rejected. The appellant had self-assessed and filed returns...

Refund claim - Notification No.17/2009 - it is clear that receipt submitted by the courier agency does not content the details as required under the notification -...

The High Court addressed a case where Budgetary support was claimed by Bagheri Unit, not Baga Unit. The court found that the petitioner's plea for full budgetary support...

Refund of service tax - Unjust enrichment - Period of limitation - Tax paid on self assessment basis - Claim of refund without challenging the assessment, to claim the...

Quick Updates: