ITAT adjudicated a tax penalty case involving multiple PAN ...

Taxpayer Successfully Challenges Income Reporting Penalty by Proving Unintentional Error and Voluntary Correction Under Section 148

April 11, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT adjudicated a tax penalty case involving multiple PAN registrations. The assessee demonstrated inadvertent income reporting across different PAN statuses (from "Firm" to "AOP"). Despite initially not including certain income components, the assessee voluntarily corrected the return during reassessment proceedings under Section 148. The Tribunal found no deliberate concealment of income, noting the assessee provided comprehensive explanations and documentary evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer, ruling in favor of the assessee by accepting the returned income and concluding there was no intentional tax evasion.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT adjudicated a tax penalty case involving multiple PAN ...

Taxpayer Successfully Challenges Income Reporting Penalty by Proving Unintentional Error and Voluntary Correction Under Section 148

April 11, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

Penalty u/s. 270A - Under-reporting of income / Mis-reporting - Interest income from income tax refunds - After reviewing the submissions and case materials, the...

Penalty u/s 270A - “under reporting” of the income - The assessee has not under reported any income. The addition has arisen on account of change in head of income. We...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

The ITAT ruled that penalties under sections 271(1)(c) and 270A against the taxpayer were improper and directed their deletion. The tribunal held that merely making an...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under s.271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation cannot be levied against the German resident...

CBIC clarifies procedure for departmental appeals regarding interest/penalty under Section 128A of CGST Act. Where taxpayers have fully paid tax demands under Section 73...

ITAT cancelled penalty under s271B for failure to furnish tax audit report under s44AB. Assessee, a first-time taxpayer from remote area, had engaged CA who audited...

Insertion of new section 270A - Penalty for underreporting and misreporting of income. - tax payable on under-reported income shall be calculated as if such...

ITAT ruled against penalty under s.270A for under-reporting income. Taxpayer met substantive conditions for immunity under s.270AA(1) by paying assessed tax and interest...

This case deals with the validity of a declaration under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) for service tax dues. The taxpayer was issued a show cause...

ITAT held that no specific charge was framed against the assessee in the show-cause notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 270A for misreporting of income. While the...

Penalty order u/s 271AAB for treating an amount included in the Return of Income as 'undisclosed income' was found unjustified. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

Quick Updates: