HC ruled on input tax credit rectification under Section 161 of ...

Tax Credit Rectification Requires Fair Hearing: Administrative Order Invalidated Due to Lack of Personal Opportunity to Present Case

April 14, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC ruled on input tax credit rectification under Section 161 of Delhi GST Act, finding procedural irregularities in the administrative order. The court held that when rectification potentially adversely impacts the applicant's rights, principles of natural justice mandate providing personal hearing. Since the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity to be heard, the rectification order dated 28th February 2025 was set aside, thereby ensuring due process and fundamental fairness in administrative proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC ruled on input tax credit rectification under Section 161 of ...

Tax Credit Rectification Requires Fair Hearing: Administrative Order Invalidated Due to Lack of Personal Opportunity to Present Case

April 14, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Withdrawing the excess tax credit for advance tax and self-assessment tax - Rectification u/s 154 - The assessee has to furnish details of different payments of tax by...

Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) inserted in section 16 of CGST Act retrospectively extend the time limit to avail input tax credit in certain specified cases...

Disallowance of TDS on account of mismatch & later on TDS matched but AO not given credit - Although the rectification application was filed beyond the permissible time...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Assessing Officer (AO) erred in denying the assessee's request for rectification u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act and...

Order quashed due to violation of natural justice principles by not granting proper opportunity for personal hearing. Excess input tax credit availed on inputs subject...

Electronic commerce operators (ECOs) required to pay tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act for specified services supplied through their platform are not required to reverse...

The High Court held that petitioners are entitled to pay 10% of the disputed GST amount as a pre-condition for filing an appeal by debiting the amount available in the...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - Difference of MAT credit not allowed to the assessee as related to surcharge and cess components of the MAT taxes paid in earlier...

Jurisdiction of the Bench to Hear the application of Rectification of Mistake - recall of the entire order - an application for rectification of a mistake u/s129B (2) of...

Rectification of mistake - error apparent on the face of record - This Court had interfered with the impugned orders on facts that were peculiar therein or for not...

HC set aside respondent's order concerning input tax credit under Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017. The matter was remanded back to respondent No.7 for fresh...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices - performa invoices - the documents required under the Rule 9 are not confined to merely invoices but these may be any documents,...

Central Government notifies special procedure for rectification of orders issued u/ss 73, 74, 107, 108 confirming demand for wrong availment of input tax credit....

HC held that under Section 194A of Income Tax Act, 1961, the tax deductor was not liable for immediate penalty when TDS was not deducted from interest/finance charges...

Quick Updates: