HC quashed the criminal complaint against petitioner no. 2 for ...

Joint Account Holder Cleared: No Vicarious Liability for Cheque Dishonor Under Criminal Complaint Without Direct Involvement

April 22, 2025

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

HC quashed the criminal complaint against petitioner no. 2 for lack of personal liability, finding no direct involvement in the transaction or cheque issuance. The court held that mere joint account holding does not establish vicarious liability. While maintaining proceedings against petitioner no. 1, the HC determined the complaint constituted an abuse of legal process due to multiplicity of proceedings and non-disclosure of prior cheque transactions. The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent procedural abuse and ensure justice, leaving the question of legally enforceable debt to be determined during trial. Petition partially allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC quashed the criminal complaint against petitioner no. 2 for ...

Joint Account Holder Cleared: No Vicarious Liability for Cheque Dishonor Under Criminal Complaint Without Direct Involvement

April 22, 2025

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

Dishonor of Cheque - drawer of cheque - Vicarious liability - From the bare reading of Section 138 of the N.I. Act, it transpires that the liability of the drawer of the...

Dishonour of cheque - vicarious liability in criminal law - The SC interpreted Section 7 of the NI Act to identify the "drawer" as the individual issuing the cheque,...

Dishonor of cheque - Proceedings against the Joint Account Holder who is not the signatory of the cheque - Section 138 of the NI Act does not speak about the joint...

Dishonor of cheque - presumption that cheque was issued in discharge of legal liability, burden on accused to prove contrary. Supreme Court observations: While deciding...

Dishonor of Cheque - signing of cheque jointly - vicarious liability u/s 141 of NI Act - True it is that in the case at hand, cheque in question has been signed by...

Dishonor of cheque - vicarious liability u/s 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act - Court held that the issue of whether statutory notice was issued is a matter of...

Dishonor of Cheque - Vicarious liability of Director - The primary liability in a cheque bounce case where cheque has been issued on behalf of the company is upon the...

Dishonor of Cheque - Generally, in the criminal law, mens rea is an essential component of crime but dishonour of cheque is a criminal offence where there is no need to...

HC dismisses petition regarding vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld that a former director cannot be held criminally...

Dishonour of Cheque - prosecution based upon second or successive dishonour of the cheque - there is nothing in the provisions of Section 138 of the Act that forbids the...

Dishonor of cheque due to account freeze falls within the purview of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The test is whether the account had insufficient...

Dishonour of Cheque - Vicarious liability - petitioner is an Independent Non-Executive Director - - the petitioner was appointed as Additional Director and resigned as...

Dishonor of Cheque - it is crystal clear that vicarious liability under sub section 1 or 2 of section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be fastened if the person...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - cheque was issued prior to the date of director joining the company - The petitioners have failed to bring on...

Dishonor of Cheque - when a cheque has been issued as a security, the consequences flowing therefrom is also known to the drawer of the cheque, and in the circumstances,...

Quick Updates: