The CESTAT upheld the vehicle confiscation under Section 115 of ...

Vehicle Confiscation Upheld: Smuggling Penalties Reduced Under Section 115 of Customs Act Despite Lack of Intentional Knowledge

April 23, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

The CESTAT upheld the vehicle confiscation under Section 115 of the Customs Act, 1962, rejecting the appellant's claim of lack of knowledge about smuggled goods. While mens rea cannot challenge confiscation, the tribunal partially allowed the appeal by reducing the redemption fine from the original amount to Rs 50,000, considering the total seizure value and disposal price of smuggled goods. The decision reinforces that conveyance used in smuggling is mandatorily confiscatable, and mere absence of intentional knowledge does not negate the confiscation order, though it may mitigate penalty implications.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The CESTAT upheld the vehicle confiscation under Section 115 of ...

Vehicle Confiscation Upheld: Smuggling Penalties Reduced Under Section 115 of Customs Act Despite Lack of Intentional Knowledge

April 23, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Confiscation of seized truck u/s 115(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 - levy of penalty - The case involved the seizure and subsequent confiscation of a vehicle allegedly...

Smuggling - Prohibited goods - confiscation of cigarettes containers concealed in HDPE granules - Penalty u/s 112 (a) &(b) and 114AA - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

The case involved smuggling of 154 mobile phones, leading to absolute confiscation and penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

Power to seizure vehicle - apprehension of misuse in future - If a possible future use of a vehicle as a means of transport for smuggling goods confers a power of...

Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

Smuggling of Cattle Heads - confiscation - penalties imposed - corroborative evidence - fraudulently used the Challan belonging to the some other party - The Tribunal...

Customs Officers seized gold bars believing they were liable for confiscation under reasonable belief of smuggling. However, the gold was covered under proper documents,...

Violation of Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006, and Customs Act regarding smuggling into the NSEZ. Determination of whether a customs...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

CESTAT set aside penalties imposed under s.112(a) and s.112(b) of Customs Act 1962 against appellant for alleged gold smuggling. Court found insufficient evidence beyond...

The case involved the absolute confiscation of cigarettes with penalty u/s 105 of Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that while lack of compliance with Cigarettes and...

10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

The case involves the levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant for smuggling foreign origin cigarettes. The appellant, a freight forwarder,...

Quick Updates: