Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2005 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2005 (9) TMI 350 - AT - Customs

Issues:
1. Interpretation of Customs Notification No. 23/98 regarding duty exemption for medical equipment accessories.
2. Classification of imported "micro pipettes" as accessories for Auto Analyser.
3. Application of Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963 to determine duty exemption eligibility.
4. Dispute over the decision of the lower appellate authority.

Analysis:
1. The case involved the interpretation of Customs Notification No. 23/98, which exempted certain medical equipment accessories from customs duty. The dispute arose when the respondents imported "micro pipettes" and claimed duty-free clearance under the said notification.

2. The original authority classified the pipettes as independent items not qualifying as accessories for medical equipment. However, the first appellate authority considered them as accessories to Auto Analyser based on evidence like purchase orders and invoices, allowing the duty exemption benefit. This led to the Revenue challenging the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals).

3. The Revenue raised several grounds of challenge, including the description of the imported goods in the manufacturer's catalogue, their independent function, and non-compliance with the Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963. Despite the pipettes having an independent function, the Commissioner (Appeals) found evidence that they were supplied along with the Auto Analyser, meeting the criteria of being accessories.

4. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), emphasizing that the pipettes were indeed supplied along with the Auto Analyser, making them eligible for duty exemption as accessories. The Tribunal agreed that fulfilling the requirements under the Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963 was crucial for determining eligibility for the exemption under the Customs Notification. As the appellant failed to rebut the evidence presented, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal.

In conclusion, the judgment clarified the classification of the imported "micro pipettes" as accessories for the Auto Analyser under Customs Notification No. 23/98, highlighting the importance of evidence and compliance with relevant rules for duty exemption eligibility.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates