Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2006 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (9) TMI 361 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
Interpretation of tax provisions - Section 44BB vs. Section 44D read with Section 115A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
The case involved two appeals by assessees against the orders of CIT (Appeals)-I, Dehradun, concerning the taxability of receipts of a non-resident under Section 44BB or as 'fees for technical services' under Section 44D read with Section 115 of the Income-tax Act. The assessees contended that the consideration paid for training provided by a non-resident was not 'fees for technical services' but fell under Section 44BB. The Assessing Officer, however, considered the services technical and applicable under Section 44D. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision, stating that the contract was not for providing services under Section 44BB. The ITAT noted that the non-resident was engaged for training on specific topics related to mineral oil exploration, extraction, and production. The CBDT's Instruction clarified that such services, including training for exploration or exploitation of oil and natural gas, do not constitute 'fees for technical services' under Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, payments for such services to a foreign company are chargeable under Section 44BB, not Section 44D read with Section 115A. The ITAT held that the consideration for training fell under Section 44BB, not technical services, setting aside the lower authorities' orders and allowing the assessees' appeals.

In conclusion, the ITAT's judgment clarified the tax treatment of payments made for training services related to mineral oil exploration and production. It emphasized that such services do not constitute 'fees for technical services' under the Income-tax Act but are chargeable under Section 44BB. The decision was based on the CBDT's Instruction, which specified that training for oil and gas exploration does not fall under technical services. This ruling favored the assessees, setting aside the lower authorities' decisions and allowing the appeals.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates