Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2006 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (9) TMI 450 - AT - Central Excise

Issues involved: Clandestine removal of raw materials, duty evasion, penalty imposition, applicability of interest, relevance of show cause notice.

Clandestine removal and duty evasion:
- M/s. Chistia Textiles and M/s. Iqbal Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. were found to have removed raw materials without payment of duty.
- Duty evaded amounts were paid before show cause notices were issued.
- Show cause notices demanded duty and proposed penalties.
- Orders confirmed duty demands, appropriated amounts paid, and imposed penalties under relevant sections of Customs and Central Excise Acts.

Penalty imposition and interest applicability:
- Appellants argued against the issuance of show cause notices, interest payment, and penalty imposition.
- Advocate cited relevant judgments to support their case.
- SDR highlighted provisions regarding penalties in cases involving fraud or collusion.
- Tribunal considered arguments and upheld penalties on both companies, emphasizing the importance of deterring fraudulent activities.

Judicial analysis and decision:
- Tribunal rejected the appellants' claims regarding show cause notice issuance.
- Emphasized that penalties are necessary to deter fraudulent activities and ensure fairness to genuine taxpayers.
- Distinguished cited judgments based on their specific contexts and findings.
- Noted the involvement of the Director in penalty imposition and set aside the penalty on Shri Azam Satar Motiwala due to lack of clear findings on his personal involvement.
- Confirmed duty demands, upheld interest applicability, and modified penalties imposed on the companies and the Director.

Conclusion:
- Tribunal confirmed duty demands, upheld interest charges, and modified penalties imposed on the companies and the Director.
- Penalty on the Director was set aside due to lack of clear findings on personal involvement.
- The appeals were disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates