9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeal against addition of excise duty reimbursement in assessment under section 143(3) for AY 2006-07. Analysis: In this case, the appeal was filed by the Revenue against the addition of excise duty reimbursement amounting to Rs. 3.92 crores in the assessment under section 143(3) for the assessment year 2006-07. The assessee contended that the excise duty reimbursement was not claimed in the profit and loss account, therefore, adding it to the returned income was a mistake apparent from the record. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held in favor of the assessee, stating that the Assessing Officer was not justified in adding the amount of excise duty reimbursement. The Tribunal considered the contentions and found that the amount in question was not claimed as a deduction in the computation of income for the relevant assessment year, making the disallowance a mistake apparent from the record. Thus, the Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Assessing Officer added the excise duty reimbursement amount based on the note in the accounts alleging no business connection with the assessee's business during the relevant year. However, the record showed that the reimbursement amount was not claimed as a deduction in the profit and loss account for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal noted that in the earlier assessment year, there was a claim for reimbursement, but not for the year under consideration. The disallowance of the excise duty reimbursement in the assessment year 2006-07 was deemed a mistake apparent from the record as it was not claimed in the profit and loss account or the computation of income. Therefore, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) that the disallowance was unjustified and constituted a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal carefully reviewed the orders of the authorities below and found that the Assessing Officer had disallowed the excise duty reimbursement amount without any evidence of it being claimed as a deduction in the profit and loss account or the computation of income for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized that the absence of such a claim in the relevant year made the disallowance a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal's decision was based on the lack of connection between the excise duty reimbursement and the assessee's business during the assessment year under consideration. As a result, the Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the addition of excise duty reimbursement in the assessment under section 143(3) for the assessment year 2006-07.
|
