9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Delay in Land Acquisition Proceedings 2. Compliance with Constitutional Mandates 3. Reasonable Time for Exercise of Statutory Powers 4. Compensation for Delay Summary: 1. Delay in Land Acquisition Proceedings: Writ petitions and a civil appeal were filed to quash land acquisition proceedings initiated between 1959 and 1965, with notifications issued u/s 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. Declarations u/s 6 were made in 1966 and 1969, but no awards were made until 1979-80. Petitioners argued that this delay pegged the market value of the lands to the dates of the initial notifications, causing significant financial injury. 2. Compliance with Constitutional Mandates: The court recognized the power of eminent domain and its constitutional limitations, ensuring compensation at market value as per the second proviso to Article 31-A. The Act mandates compensation based on the market value at the date of the notification u/s 4(1), irrespective of delays in declarations or awards. The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 introduced a time-limit for making awards, failing which proceedings lapse. 3. Reasonable Time for Exercise of Statutory Powers: The court emphasized that statutory powers must be exercised within a reasonable time, even if no time-limit is specified. Previous judgments (State of Gujarat v. Patel Raghav Natha, Mansaram v. S.P. Pathak) supported this view. The court found that the authorities failed to act within a reasonable time, causing undue delay in land acquisition proceedings. 4. Compensation for Delay: The court noted that the delay in making awards violated the constitutional mandate of paying market value compensation. The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 did not validate or condone past delays. Given the public interest and development on the acquired lands, quashing the proceedings was deemed inappropriate. Instead, the court directed additional compensation at 12% per annum from two years after the 1974 Aflatoon case judgment until the awards were made, calculated based on the market value at the notification date u/s 4(1). The writ petitions and civil appeal were partially allowed, with no order as to costs.
|
