2010 (8) TMI 509 - AT - Central Excise

Scrutiny - Vigilance - Cenvat credit- Once such a position comes to notice, it is very difficult to conceive that a Single Member Bench should intervene while similar such matter is pending before Hon ble High Court of Karnataka - Therefore, Registry is directed to place the matter before Division Bench to re-consider exercise of appropriate jurisdiction by Bench

Summary

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore directed the Registry to explain a default in conducting scrutiny of a file and ordered the matter regarding grant of cenvat credit on outward transport issues to be reconsidered by the Division Bench due to a pending judgment from the High Court of Karnataka.